Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 133

Thread: Not 30%..... NO loot

  1. #21
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    849

    If you want to keep players and get new ones...

    Fewer sticks, more carrots, please.

    This last update was 90% sticks. And you're trying to fix it with more sticks? Come on! There's an uproar right now! If something is actually broken, damage control has to be something that most people can be on board with!

  2. #22
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    175
    Quote Originally Posted by ErwinB View Post
    A few seconds to size up a base? You have 30 seconds to start with and than you have another 3 minutes to do the attack. Most attacks take about 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 minutes, so you have like 1 minute to study...

    Implementing is very simple, no 30% damage is no loot...
    OK so I was generalising with a few seconds, but 1 minute to size up and attack a base for some really isn't long enough. I have seen people study a war base for hours and still come up with an absolutely shocking plan of attack. So however much I would love to see me loosing no loot for someone who gets less than 30% damage, I cannot say I agree with this what so ever.

  3. #23
    New Guy
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Andvareel View Post
    Fewer sticks, more carrots, please.

    This last update was 90% sticks. And you're trying to fix it with more sticks? Come on! There's an uproar right now! If something is actually broken, damage control has to be something that most people can be on board with!
    I'd like to think that CoC was created for those who like to attack and get as far as possible during that attack. And not for those who just want a quick steal and get out...
    Wasn't the whole update about SC wanting to see better attacks?!!

  4. #24
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    849
    If they want better attacks, then give us a reason to let attacks go to fruition. As soon as you get heros, everyone hits the abort button as soon as it's sensible to do so.

  5. #25
    New Guy
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Djgizz View Post
    OK so I was generalising with a few seconds, but 1 minute to size up and attack a base for some really isn't long enough. I have seen people study a war base for hours and still come up with an absolutely shocking plan of attack. So however much I would love to see me loosing no loot for someone who gets less than 30% damage, I cannot say I agree with this what so ever.
    I just can NOT believe that anyone who trains a serious attacking squad with spells can't get 30% on a same th level!!
    If they really can't get up to 30% on a similar th level as their own, they should start playing cards or something...

  6. #26
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    849
    The cheap fix is = double click a hero that used ability already = hero evac.
    The expensive fix is to not be so damned greedy hoping people will gem heros back to full health.

    As a freemium, they won't. They want money.
    And as a player, I'm not going to drop everything every time. I want to play more, not wait for troops to cook. I'm going to drop a sensible amount to get the best returns against a particular base.

  7. #27
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    849
    Quote Originally Posted by ErwinB View Post
    I just can NOT believe that anyone who trains a serious attacking squad with spells can't get 30% on a same th level!!
    If they really can't get up to 30% on a similar th level as their own, they should start playing cards or something...
    Funnel + core will take out the TH and DE... and MAYBE get 30%.

  8. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    al-Mamlaka al-Arabiyya as-Suudiyya
    Posts
    3,811
    Until SC changes something, the attacker has the right to terminate the attack whenever they see fit...

  9. #29
    Pro Member Indiankingofkings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    India
    Posts
    716
    How about if we lose around 100k of gold or elixir and 1k DE we get shield? Resources have been minimal and getting a shield after losing resources would actually make sense.
    More Power to Fair Play

  10. #30
    Centennial Club SwagDaz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    196
    I don't think the attacker should see the percentage damage caused until they hit 30%. That'll make it much harder to spitefully leave the defender on 29%, which happens all too often to me.
    || TH 13 || LVL 210 || GG 2Bn || EE 2Bn || HH 18.1m || BK 65 || AQ 66 || GW 40 || RC 5 ||
    || Leader of '$£ SWAG £$' || #8PCCPQRY || Lvl 16
    || CWL Champs 2 || 461 Wins ||

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •