I won't flame. But that doesn't mean I can't criticize it either.
Nope. Nope. Nope Nope Nope Nope. Nope. Here's why:
- First off this is done with 100 levels of heroes. No farmer has that and therefore it is unreasonable to look to this as a viable example.
- Five spells. Even if they weren't needed, this "half hour army" now takes over an hour and a half. That is, without gems of course.

- Search cost is not factored in. You haven't said anything about search time, the amount of nexts it took, or what you found in between. With farming so reliant on effeciency any argument with only one raid is null and void.
Let's now analyze a couple of his statements.
I'm sorry but you really have no right to discuss how easy it is for TH9s to get champs bonus if you aren't one. You might have an alt (which I'm certain you don't; I was in Invictus for four months and didn't hear a mention of an alt you had.)
This confirms the previous statement about how it was only one raid.
We did look at that as a "viable source of income" pre-update. What you imply, from my perspective, is that all complainers are collector farmers which couldn't be further from the truth.
The shield stuff: yeah, but you get raided for so many trophies, it's literally impossible to sustain with the schedule of casuals. Making any statement to counter this would imply that SC desires to see casuals in Legend league which is contradictory.
In summary, the following has been stated:
- A single raid which contains an alleged profit of about 1m using a so called "half hour army", that uses a full loadout of clan castle troops, spells and heroes which the average joe farmer does not have access to
- Therefore, from this, the best solution is to move up into leagues, and it could be stated that one of the implications is that Legend league is a sustainable place for farming and should be utilized for farming. When, in truth, SC is claiming that they got rid of farming.
Overall, I don't trust it, and I encourage others to do the same. It is a very confusing post and overall should not be taken at its face value.