Read carefully. For clashers, administrators and moderators.

[UnmercifulCanteloupe1]

Oh and you understand how things work eh? You are naive, child.

Stop trying to act mature. Lol.

[vivian265]

Stop trying to act mature. Lol.

OP's second account?

[Lloopy14]

So you've run out of intelligent things to say in response to my comment and therefore choose to pick on something completely irrelevant? Your lack of knowledge pains me. To create such a childish thread with absolutely no backing was a mistake. To further this by making crude comments that have no relevance to another's feedback shows only immaturity. Return to these forums once you've grown up.

I'd like to point you to the following comment.

I think he used a number just to basically apply the law of supply and demand, no need to get aggressive. Basically he's saying if income is better then supercell done is job. If it drops then adjustment needs to be made.

This is what the OP was trying to do. he could have used symbols instead of numbers, like a , Ax2 ax3 etc, but his point is still valid, even though I disagree with it.

[vivian265]

I'd like to point you to the following comment.



This is what the OP was trying to do. he could have used symbols instead of numbers, like a , Ax2 ax3 etc, but his point is still valid, even though I disagree with it.

I've seen the comment and I understand what the OP has tried to do. However, we've seen countless threads with theories that have been conjured up with no background at all. The thread purely slates SC and states the obvious that they are trying to make money.

[ItsZez]

I disagree. They don't care about how much each individual is spending...they care about the total.

[immortarr]

So you've run out of intelligent things to say in response to my comment and therefore choose to pick on something completely irrelevant? Your lack of knowledge pains me. To create such a childish thread with absolutely no backing was a mistake. To further this by making crude comments that have no relevance to another's feedback shows only immaturity. Return to these forums once you've grown up.

Read something else. i think I was perfectly clear towards your post. Read something else and goodbye.

[immortarr]

I disagree. They don't care about how much each individual is spending...they care about the total.

They don't care about each individual, true. They care about the categories of individuals that are formed. It's not accurate enough if you care about the total number. Difficult to predict the changes needed to media that way. You need to categorize so as to make more accurate changes.

[Lloopy14]

I've seen the comment and I understand what the OP has tried to do. However, we've seen countless threads with theories that have been conjured up with no background at all. The thread purely slates SC and states the obvious that they are trying to make money.

Yes it does slate SC, but does this mean that the OP is wrong? Even I can't help thinking that this is a money orientated update with the extra 2 hour village guard thing for 10 gems. That a company should use financial data to examine the success of the update would be nothing new. Heck it would be negligent not to keep an eye on the bottom line.

However arguing rationally with the OP makes much more sense, at the moment you are coming off on this badly. I didn't meet the clash team, I did meet some of the boom team. They are genuinely enthusiastic about their game and the changes that they make. I can't see that clash is any different. That is why I am not as cynical as other people who post like this on the forum

NB, by argue I mean argue as in a discussion/debate not flame war/
.

[Biggy2M]

Now, if the numbers don't get where they want, more punishment is meant to come to clashers. What I am telling you guys is something that happens often in many companies. It's all about the numbers. If the companies numbers are right, as they want them to be, no changes are to come. If they are not, they will keep altering the game until they reach the desirable figures.

I work for a company which dwarfs SC, but the number policy is the exact same. If the figures match what they want, not what the market at any given moment allows, everything goes smooth. If they predict the figures going down bellow whatever the administration wants, customers are severely punished.
Many of our customers book in advance, some even years, but most less than 6 months, and they do reservations based on specific offers, but as most people would do, they pay on arrival and not in advance. Anyone can die in 6 months. But the company simply don't care about giving the customers what they booked. If last week they decided to raise the prices, the customer who booked 4 months ago for a cheaper offer has two options: Pay the price they want, or (what we get a lot here now) stop whining and go somewhere else. And refuse to honnor what they promised to the customers.
I'm in Europe and had customers from the USA complaining about this and that it was a huge kick in their plans. They mocking people, promising one thing and then just because they are GREEDY change the rules to their own benefit regardless of customer expectation and previous comitment.
Those figures are fiction, but the attitude is very real in bussines. I have a friend who is the manager of a branch of a large company. Once discussing these practices used by many companies he replied to me, and i quote: "This is bussines, we need to make money.". Enough said.

[CoCPlayer3574]

I've seen the comment and I understand what the OP has tried to do. However, we've seen countless threads with theories that have been conjured up with no background at all. The thread purely slates SC and states the obvious that they are trying to make money.

Hypotheses... Just saying...