Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Shield change

  1. #1
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,132

    Shield change

    Shields aren't reliable enaugh at th10+. There is much failed attacks which end to 20-29% damage. Still causing loot loss and trap refilling cost to defender.

    So new rule:
    20-29% damage done and 70%+ of attacker max troops used -> shield 6-8 hours.

  2. #2
    Furry Bunny
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    JOIN SMIRK NATION: https://discord.gg/hyUS4aa
    Posts
    15,203
    If there's going to be a shield for that, I think it should be 12 hours, especially because the attacker put down so many troops.


  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Probably raiding a village with Valkyries
    Posts
    99
    I actually do agree with this.

    If a player wastes his whole army on your base and you are able to defend from it.
    you should get a shield nomatter the %age

    I actually attacked a th10 yesterday and stole 70% of his available loot. got a 28% (didnt manage to lure the whole clancastle so my giants got shred apart...) but he didnt get a shield from my attack.

    so yes i do agree. if you get attacked by lower players or people that dont know how to attack and you manage to defend to 70+% of your attackers army you should get a shield.
    Heavywater / Sons of Liberty / TH9
    Pro at being a noob!


  4. #4
    Forum Elder
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    2,132
    There would be also part of league bonus for defender on failed attack under 70% troops used rule...

  5. #5
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    3

    Shield system is very bad

    New shield system is very bad I hate it

  6. #6
    Senior Member Blackdeath1K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    294
    Multiple regular members in my clan that spend money on the game regularly are close to quitting because of this new system.

    Some people have lives. And strong bases. And spend money on the game. But can't play except maybe an hour a day. If your at a constant loss what is the point? And as stated in above posts. Im one with a mid level 10 base with all lego wall. People can strategically attack me. Get all my de and end the attack. Save there troops. And me not get a shield. Loosing 3000+ de multiple times in a row over night takes quite a bit of play time to get back.

    Make the th snipe shield time a lot less. Heck. 5 hours even. But by getting rid of it all together supercell is effectionetly alienating a good percentage of paying customers.

    Also if the snipe shield comes back the loot stored in the th needs to change back to what it was in the past.

  7. #7
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by Blackdeath1K View Post
    Also if the snipe shield comes back the loot stored in the th needs to change back to what it was in the past.
    Actually I think it would be great to keep it a storage but have it offer a shield. Is it worth it to you to get 1/5 of your loot taken for a shield? Or put it inside and defend a proper attack? I'd be all on board for snipe shields coming back as long as the TH remains a storage.

    P.S. - I like the changes to this update, except for the huge elixir shortage that is progressively getting worse.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •