Keep two war attacks but allow to hit same base twice

[Xav1]

The game was intended for a one chance only attack both in multiplayer and clan wars and I don't believe that should ever be changed. Play the game legally not try and persuade legalising something that spoils sportsmanship/gamemanship.

This ^ x10

[ironagedave]

furthermore one last thing - then I will let this thread rest - how many people would see the value of this if you sacrifice your loot bonus of one of your attacks for this function to be implemented - that's quite a bit of a sacrifice when sandboxing as you say is a cheaper more effective way, so i do not see it combating it in any case - if anything it would perhaps expose more people to sandboxing in the first place.

[jugulius]

attacking same base twice will lead players to abuse the first attack to reveal traps and cc.
if you messed up your first attack, let others fix it.

[joshhollis7]

Part of a defense is element of surprise, whether it's trap placement or cc troops. So what you're saying is you screw up and I should be punished for that. Move on to the next guy and maybe try another strategy.

[DizzyArsenal]

This is just wrong on so many levels I can't even be bothered to explain why.



^ This. so lol

Seems like you don't know how to explain it instead of not bothering to. You must not run into bunny users very often. It's so prominent it's basically legal. Supercell does nothing about it except ban the use of talking about it.

[DizzyArsenal]

What you think it would be ok for a footballer to ask a referee if he could re-take a penalty kick because the goalkeeper dived the right way?

Logic fail. Using your analogy, I'm saying if a footballer has two penalty kicks, he shouldn't be forced to select a second keeper for the second shot.

[DizzyArsenal]

I realize now that many of you on this thread don't know what I'm talking about nor do you understand what you are talking about. I noticed dave isn't a war guy. He's from a weaker clan and doesn't war much or war that well. He is probably a pusher, as many of you likely are. Nothing wrong with that at all. However, the perspective is different from the war community, especially elite war clans. We regularly come up against bunny users. It's so prominent, it's expected. Thus saying this will encourage it more is funny because it can't grow much more. I am from an elite fair play clan and we are hunted by bunny users often.

So my suggestion isn't as radical as some of you are making it out to be. My perspective comes from playing against top players with tough anti-3 star bases and opponents that are bunny users. I think that's a different story from the typical gowipe clans that you belong to.

[ironagedave]

Logic fail. Using your analogy, I'm saying if a footballer has two penalty kicks, he shouldn't be forced to select a second keeper for the second shot.

Lol I think you just logic failed yourself you are asking to attack the same base. Therefore same keeper my analogy is not flawed but I suggest you stop splitting hairs because at the rate your going you won't even have any on your shoulders.

[Shards]

I'd say it's not a bad idea, but no extra loot. That way, you only do it if you need to, not just to "sandbox"

[Temur]

Sandboxing is basically legal. This would be a simple and fair change that would allow non-sandboxers to attack again. The restriction is arbitrary. You should have two attacks and do with them what you will.

♥♥♥♥, WHAT!!! PEOPLE THESE DAYS