Keep two war attacks but allow to hit same base twice

[DizzyArsenal]

This would be a simple change yet make a large impact and please a lot of people. How many times have you planned a raid on your first war attack and made a simple mistake that ruined the raid? If you can use your second attack to make those adjustments, it sure would feel better. It also allows a wider strategic variation within clan wars. Please consider allowing two attacks on any enemy base even the same one twice.

[ironagedave]

This would be a simple change yet make a large impact and please a lot of people. How many times have you planned a raid on your first war attack and made a simple mistake that ruined the raid? If you can use your second attack to make those adjustments, it sure would feel better. It also allows a wider strategic variation within clan wars. Please consider allowing two attacks on any enemy base even the same one twice.

What so you know where all the traps and realise you should have dealt with the cc troops first etc - no sorry I disagree you mess up your first attack you should only get one attempt on any base in war.

Your attack performance is what is being tested, you implement this - then there is no test it is merely a dress rehearsal - where is the fun/challenge in that - you might aswell legalise sandboxing while your at it...

[DizzyArsenal]

What so you know where all the traps and realise you should have dealt with the cc troops first etc - no sorry I disagree you mess up your first attack you should only get one attempt on any base in war.

Your attack performance is what is being tested, you implement this - then there is no test it is merely a dress rehearsal - where is the fun/challenge in that - you might aswell legalise sandboxing while your at it...

Sandboxing is basically legal. This would be a simple and fair change that would allow non-sandboxers to attack again. The restriction is arbitrary. You should have two attacks and do with them what you will.

[Robindevil]

Hello fellow clashers...
your Idea is good could be possible but it is against the rules of sup cel
You can do the petition

[DizzyArsenal]

I'm not advocating sandboxing. I thought my idea was clear. I am advocating that the two attacks you have during war should not be restricted. You should be able to attack the same base twice.

[Temur]

Just saying, but you can just use the mirror technique and not use clean up. You can find the traps for the first attack, then attack again being over powerful and finding all traps. As you know, sand boxing is born into COC if this happens

[ironagedave]

Sandboxing is basically legal. This would be a simple and fair change that would allow non-sandboxers to attack again.

I'm not advocating sandboxing. I thought my idea was clear. I am advocating that the two attacks you have during war should not be restricted. You should be able to attack the same base twice.

Two contradictory statements going over the same base twice is effectively sandboxing your using the first to test a base (trial run etc), the second to execute to precision your attack.

Sand boxing asside this would also have a significant impact on slight or more severe mismatches.

[DizzyArsenal]

Two contradictory statements going over the same base twice is effectively sandboxing your using the first to test a base (trial run etc), the second to execute to precision your attack.

Sand boxing asside this would also have a significant impact on slight or more severe mismatches.

No it's not. Sandboxing = unlimited attacks that don't cost anything to build and don't count towards your official attack. My proposal is only two attacks, which the game currently uses, without restriction on who you can attack. If you think that is the same, then you are being purposefully obtuse.

[Reav3R]

This is just wrong on so many levels I can't even be bothered to explain why.

Sandboxing is basically legal. This would be a simple and fair change that would allow non-sandboxers to attack again. The restriction is arbitrary. You should have two attacks and do with them what you will.

^ This. so lol

[ironagedave]

No it's not. Sandboxing = unlimited attacks that don't cost anything to build and don't count towards your official attack. My proposal is only two attacks, which the game currently uses, without restriction on who you can attack. If you think that is the same, then you are being purposefully obtuse.

<sigh>

Whatever you say. Yes dear your absolutely right dear. Whatever you want dear. I am clearly just splitting hairs of course and being an illiterate jerk thankyou for allowing me to spot the evil of my ways.

Now for the reality...

1) "effectively sandboxing" was my term used - of course it is not actually sanboxing but then again - sandboxing was created for a completely different purposes in the first place not for what abusers in the game are using it for. It's function is therefore abused - you implement this and it abuses the system in exactly the same way (in terms of results not necessarily methodology) and as I said it will have far bigger ramifications on mismatches.

The game was intended for a one chance only attack both in multiplayer and clan wars and I don't believe that should ever be changed. Play the game legally not try and persuade legalising something that spoils sportsmanship/gamemanship.

What you think it would be ok for a footballer to ask a referee if he could re-take a penalty kick because the goalkeeper dived the right way?