Allow any clan member but not a new member to be able to start a coup d'état where a request is sent to clan members to join the clan leader or the one who started it.if the mutineers win their leader becomes the clan leader and the adverse team gets demoted but if the mutineers loose they all get kicked from the clan .
Sounds like a great way to hi-jack a clan.
Here's an idea, if you don't like the clan you are in and alot of clan mates feel the same, go and make a new clan. Problem solved.
Actually i didnt mean it that way but i find it a more amusing way then always attacking enemys plus evry great empire lost because of betrayers and alliances change and so do leaders plus a good cant get his clan hijacked by anyone and if my idea is made clan members will be pucked more carefully and based on loyalty rather then accepting anyone who u think might be useful.
I said the real leader's team can't be kicked but demoted that means he can have all the chances he want to get his leadership back and this idea also encorage the leader to be the best in his clan so ....
Hypothetical scenario. A clan that is lvl3 finds a lvl6 clan. They all decide to join that clan. They just need the majority of votes, and they now have a lvl6 clan for free.Originally Posted by michmazbout
Sometimes idea's go in directions you dont think they will. But they do. Clan members are picked on utility, loyalty is something that you can never figure out until they prove it. Even then, you never really know who's loyal. Some spies have been in deep cover for 10-15 years.
Good clans that are high leveled are ran by people that know what they are doing. But all the time you have people that come along and think they know better, and try to give advice or tips. Sometimes its good, most of the time its bad advice. And then they think they can do it better, and start their own clan, give out free co, end up with a clan that is terrible, and repeat the cycle. Or quit.
Clans are not democracies. They are dictatorships. You can go be your dictator if you want. And the biggest empire of all fell because it stopped being a crushing dictatorship and started letting new people in and giving in to demands. Rome was destroyed because they let outsiders have a say. The mongols did a much better job. Change and adapt to the mongol way, or be completely destroyed. Maybe i should be able to delete your account if you cause me too many problems if we want to make this better reflect ancient empires?
I don't know how you learned history, but many of these things you mentioned are not true. Rome was actually successful because it successfully incorporated conquered people into the Roman Empire. The Mongols may have been more successful in terms of conquering land, but their empire was short lived.
Anyway, too the OP. This is a bad idea because this would cause too much chaos.
Posting Permissions
