Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Global Clan War Leaderboard

  1. #1
    Centennial Club Dmanii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    USA: Oregon
    Posts
    131

    Global Clan War Leaderboard

    There really isn't a way to see the best war clan in the game. In my opinion the best war clan would be all TH10s that consistently win, would you agree? However there is no way to know what clan that is.

    I purpose a leader board similar to clan trophies BUT, it displays a clans TOTAL war loot earned during the season. It would contain a similar gem award as the trophy leader board as well.

    Two things that would make this awesome is:

    1. No one can just create a clan have people join and its on top. You actually have to WIN wars, and to get more loot that clan has to be high level for the loot bonuses, thus meaning it has to have been around for awhile.

    2. It would create a transparency of who is winning wars are collecting the most loot. The community will know that that clan is essentially the best.

    This is a pretty basic idea, let me know what you think!
    IGN: DMan II
    Coc: Started: Dec 30th, 2012 | Level: 150 | TH Level: 11 | Clan: None - I quit
    Royale: Started: Mar 2nd, 2016 | Level: 12 | High Trophy: 5352 | Clan: Oregon (Leader)

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Dmanii View Post
    There really isn't a way to see the best war clan in the game. In my opinion the best war clan would be all TH10s that consistently win, would you agree? However there is no way to know what clan that is.

    I purpose a leader board similar to clan trophies BUT, it displays a clans TOTAL war loot earned during the season. It would contain a similar gem award as the trophy leader board as well.

    Two things that would make this awesome is:

    1. No one can just create a clan have people join and its on top. You actually have to WIN wars, and to get more loot that clan has to be high level for the loot bonuses, thus meaning it has to have been around for awhile.

    2. It would create a transparency of who is winning wars are collecting the most loot. The community will know that that clan is essentially the best.

    This is a pretty basic idea, let me know what you think!
    I really like the idea of a leader board for war clans. I wonder if you could tie war experience into it. So every league, the leading clans would be the ones that have earned the most XP. This could possibly reward clans that aren't winning, but in the long run, those who are winning consistantly will rise to the top.

    One thing it wouldn't help is good warn clans that don't war back to back or don't do 50 man wars. You could have a 100% war win record over the course of the cycle, but they wouldn't show up on the leader board because they don't earn enough XP as a clan that only with 75% of their wars but goes back to back.

    Just a few thoughts of my own....

  3. #3
    Centennial Club Dmanii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    USA: Oregon
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Beastzilla View Post
    I really like the idea of a leader board for war clans. I wonder if you could tie war experience into it. So every league, the leading clans would be the ones that have earned the most XP. This could possibly reward clans that aren't winning, but in the long run, those who are winning consistantly will rise to the top.

    One thing it wouldn't help is good warn clans that don't war back to back or don't do 50 man wars. You could have a 100% war win record over the course of the cycle, but they wouldn't show up on the leader board because they don't earn enough XP as a clan that only with 75% of their wars but goes back to back.

    Just a few thoughts of my own....

    I think it would play more into the hardcore war clans similar to how for the trophy clans all they really do is push (boring...). If you don't do back to back wars then you shouldn't be on the list of top clans in my opinion. And yes, most of the top clans would be TH9-TH10, High level clan 8-10, with 45-50 players with back to back wars. Winning a 50 person war is more challenging due to requiring full participation, and higher level bases is harder as well. That combined with consistent wins would make them the best war clan and deserving of the top spot in my opinion.
    IGN: DMan II
    Coc: Started: Dec 30th, 2012 | Level: 150 | TH Level: 11 | Clan: None - I quit
    Royale: Started: Mar 2nd, 2016 | Level: 12 | High Trophy: 5352 | Clan: Oregon (Leader)

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    90
    Quote Originally Posted by Dmanii View Post
    I think it would play more into the hardcore war clans similar to how for the trophy clans all they really do is push (boring...). If you don't do back to back wars then you shouldn't be on the list of top clans in my opinion. And yes, most of the top clans would be TH9-TH10, High level clan 8-10, with 45-50 players with back to back wars. Winning a 50 person war is more challenging due to requiring full participation, and higher level bases is harder as well. That combined with consistent wins would make them the best war clan and deserving of the top spot in my opinion.
    Agreed, the best war clans are the ones that war non stop and win. My point was that it may be difficult to tell which ones are high percentage wins verse high membership, non stop war clans. For example, is a clan that does 50 man wars back to back but only wins 75% more deserving of a spot on the leader board than a clan that does 40 man wars back to back and wins 100%? And both of these scenarios would be trumped by the 50 man clan that wins 100%. I'm just saying there is some gray area in there.

    However, no war requires full participation to win. Full participation helps, but technically, you only ever need half your attacks to win a war. Granted, it's highlying likely that the two are related (especially when you get to all TH10 wars). However a 50 man war is often less difficult than a 15 man war. If 1 person messes up in a 50 man war you have another 49 who can potentially help clean up the mess. In a 15 man war you would only have 14.

    I do like your idea of using war loot as part of the calculation. That would weigh the leader board in the higher TH's favor....which is a good thing.

  5. #5
    Centennial Club Dmanii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    USA: Oregon
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Beastzilla View Post
    Is a clan that does 50 man wars back to back but only wins 75% more deserving of a spot on the leader board than a clan that does 40 man wars back to back and wins 100%? And both of these scenarios would be trumped by the 50 man clan that wins 100%. I'm just saying there is some gray area in there.

    ...


    I do like your idea of using war loot as part of the calculation. That would weigh the leader board in the higher TH's favor....which is a good thing.
    Good point. I am actually interested to see what these numbers would be in terms of loot earned as a clan. Even though clans like BRUTUS are hitting the top level fast they have tons of low level THs to get easier match ups. I do think the total war loot earned as a clan is a good indicator of: winning, difficulty, and participation.
    IGN: DMan II
    Coc: Started: Dec 30th, 2012 | Level: 150 | TH Level: 11 | Clan: None - I quit
    Royale: Started: Mar 2nd, 2016 | Level: 12 | High Trophy: 5352 | Clan: Oregon (Leader)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •