Should a 1 star attack earn the same loot as a 3 star attack?

[Peppers2ndMom]

The fact that a one-star attack earns the same loot as a three-star attack is counter-productive. It encourages players to accept a mediocre attack, rather than striving for excellence.

I would like to suggest that war loot be allocated on the basis of stars earned, similar to the method used to award trophies while farming. A 3-star attack should earn the maximum amount of war loot. A 2-star attack should earn 2/3 the amount that would be awarded to a 3-star attack, and a 1-star attack should earn 1/3 the amount.

I believe this method will encourage players to improve their war attacks, while also rewarding those who work hard to ensure their attacks are 100%.

[Xav1]

The fact that a one-star attack earns the same loot as a three-star attack is counter-productive. It encourages players to accept a mediocre attack, rather than striving for excellence.

I would like to suggest that war loot be allocated on the basis of stars earned, similar to the method used to award trophies while farming. A 3-star attack should earn the maximum amount of war loot. A 2-star attack should earn 2/3 the amount that would be awarded to a 3-star attack, and a 1-star attack should earn 1/3 the amount.

I believe this method will encourage players to improve their war attacks, while also rewarding those who work hard to ensure their attacks are 100%.

Let me ask you this....are you a th10? Do you regularly attack maxed th10's in war?

Yes, I already know the answer to both those questions is "No"

The ability to 3 star a well developed th10 is a rarity, not the norm. Your idea would make it nearly impossible for a th10 attacking another th10 from being awarded full war loot....seem fair?

[JJ2478]

Let me ask you this....are you a th10? Do you regularly attack maxed th10's in war?

Yes, I already know the answer to both those questions is "No"

The ability to 3 star a well developed th10 is a rarity, not the norm. Your idea would make it nearly impossible for a th10 attacking another th10 from being awarded full war loot....seem fair?

This. This. This. Also, when you're a TH8 who has lvl 1 drags is matched against a TH8 with max ADs, are you going to 3 star? No.

[cargovroomvroom]

This. This. This. Also, when you're a TH8 who has lvl 1 drags is matched against a TH8 with max ADs, are you going to 3 star? No.

Why are you attacking a TH8 with max ADs and you have level one drags? That should not happen. The first post was correct, however your point is invalid. It seems like you are promoting a hopeless mediocre attack.

[hoopstime98]

The fact that a one-star attack earns the same loot as a three-star attack is counter-productive. It encourages players to accept a mediocre attack, rather than striving for excellence.

I would like to suggest that war loot be allocated on the basis of stars earned, similar to the method used to award trophies while farming. A 3-star attack should earn the maximum amount of war loot. A 2-star attack should earn 2/3 the amount that would be awarded to a 3-star attack, and a 1-star attack should earn 1/3 the amount.

I believe this method will encourage players to improve their war attacks, while also rewarding those who work hard to ensure their attacks are 100%.

If you're in a clan where people need to be encouraged to get more stars based on the amount of loot they can get out of it, you're not in a very good clan with very good members. I've never heard one person in any clan I've been in say "Well, I could strive to 3 star, but since I get the same loot, I just don't care about getting stars or winning wars".

The better argument FOR this idea is if SC decided they don't like people who farm wars and wanted to punish them for doing so. People who care about winning wars already care about getting the most stars they can. Lowering the amount of loot available is counterproductive to SC encouraging wars. People will be less likely to do them if they are less likely to profit even when they win (unless you are going to increase war loot significantly).

In the end, I don't see it as an issue. I think in general people are going to try their best to get stars because that's how you win.

[JJ2478]

Why are you attacking a TH8 with max ADs and you have level one drags? That should not happen. The first post was correct, however your point is invalid. It seems like you are promoting a hopeless mediocre attack.

Whatever. That situations happen constantly for me. TH8 with lvl 4 ADs should not be matching TH8s that have full skulls and max d
although I have max rage spells and lvl 3 drags

[cargovroomvroom]

Whatever. That situations happen constantly for me. TH8 with lvl 4 ADs should not be matching TH8s that have full skulls and max d
although I have max rage spells and lvl 3 drags

You should not be attacking your equal.... It's a faulty system.....
Also.... Why did you not max ADs....

[JJ2478]

You should not be attacking your equal.... It's a faulty system.....
Also.... Why did you not max ADs....

I'm in a mixed clan, the #2 is a TH6
Oh... for war matchmaking

[cargovroomvroom]

I'm in a mixed clan, the #2 is a TH6
Oh... for war matchmaking

That is one of the saddest things I have ever seen. War matchmaking? You are kidding, right?


Anyway..... it is common for the #1 on both sides to be mismatched..... It's the best they can do...

[Raspberry]

I'm happy with how it is.
But I'd also be happy with the proportion of the reward being based on percentage destruction. To me, that makes more sense than linking it to stars.