This is a clan game. Within the clan the leader & co leaders should be able to donate resources & even gems at their discretion to their clan members & each other. This could even include elders so the number of co leaders in a clan doesn't have to be increased. Nothing forces these donations ofc but it should be able to be done to help loyal clan members. We earn resources & buy gems...at our discretion we should also be able to share them.
Hello and welcome on the forums. Please read the sticky threads before creating a new topic, since you might find out the idea you are about to suggest has been ruled out. In this case, your suggestion cannot be implemented into the game because it was ruled out by SuperCell for the time being.
Read more about ruled out ideas here: READ BEFORE POSTING - Ideas, ruled out, subforum guidelinesCurrently Ruled Out:
Frequently Requested:
*Donating (or trading) resources or gems to (with) other players
Originally Posted by BRLESNAR
"Trust those who seek the truth but doubt those who say they have found it."
I think it is a great idea.
Supercell should think about this idea.
It would make a clan more closer and loyal.
No need to switch from one clan to another.
I agree this would make clans closer and more friendly, but there are too many potential problems with it for it to be considered. It would make it extremely easy to accumulate resources, for example. By constantly asking for resources, the need to participate in wars, raid for resources, etc. would dissipate. Isn't playing and competing for resources (and thus upgrading structures) the entire point of the game? If we could gain resources so easily, it'd take the fun out of it. Inequalities with the value of resources for each Town Hall level would also complicate things. At low Town Hall levels, 50,000 Gold might be worth a ton, but to a Town Hall 10, it's worth next to nothing. You might argue that a system where the donation limit changes with each Town Hall level would balance this, but it doesn't. If a limit for a Town Hall 10 was 100,000 Gold or Elixir, newbies could be donating tons of upgrades' worth of loot for something that's worth one fiftieth of an established Town Hall 10's upgrades, for example.
Donating Gems is a problem for many of the same reasons, and also because it's the way the developers make money. If people constantly donated Gems, the temptation to purchase them with money would decrease, thus causing the game to be less profitable for the developers. Clearing obstacles generates a good enough income of gems in my opinion, and so does trophy pushing to earn the League All-Star achievement, which gives you tons of gems.
When an idea is ruled out, it's ruled out for a reason. There is no point challenging it, as the developers have obviously already weighed up the pros and cons of the idea before putting in the common requests thread.
Check the ruled out ideas
The main problem with this is that the new players get a lot of gems very easily.
It would be much too easy to create new accounts, spend no gems, earn the easy gems and dump them to an existing account. (That's pretty much why you can't trade gems and you can't raid them from someone else's base)
It would be a way to transfer resources between accounts, I say no
SORYE GE TON!
If one could only donate purchased gems, there would be zero issues.
One can make infinite accounts and receive 500 from each account and be collected into 1 main account. So um nope lol.
No way this will destroy the game
MAX TH10
Lvl 135
