Can't attack the same target?

[Contender570]

Since when was this implemented? This is by far one of the most stupidest things I have ever seen in a game. The fact that a lower level clan member messed up his attack the first time and can't attempt another attack on the same target is stupid. Not only is this possibly gonna cost us the war but it also costs us resources. How do you expect someone who failed a attack on lets say number 7 then expect them to attack number 2? Man this is ridiculous, you should really change this SC.

[Cowbug]

This has not been changed, it has always been. Probably 1 reason could be to prevent/reduce possible sandboxing.

[Contender570]

This has not been changed, it has always been. Probably 1 reason could be to prevent/reduce possible sandboxing.

I guess thats a possibility. But either way after the first attack people are gonna see where things are either way imo.

[Aegonkai]

I agree it's a pain sometimes, but it also prevents stubborn clanmates from consecutively failing to 3-star the same base, I suppose.

[Contender570]

Guess who got 0 stars... Damn, this is upsetting. I never knew not attacking the same target was a thing.

[VikDaman]

Since when was this implemented? This is by far one of the most stupidest things I have ever seen in a game. The fact that a lower level clan member messed up his attack the first time and can't attempt another attack on the same target is stupid. Not only is this possibly gonna cost us the war but it also costs us resources. How do you expect someone who failed a attack on lets say number 7 then expect them to attack number 2? Man this is ridiculous, you should really change this SC.

This was implemented when wars started. The stupidest thing i have seen in a game is someone complaining about a change that never occurred. If your lower member messed up an attack he shouldn't get a redo this would essentially mean i could scout a base and reattack it knowing where all traps teslas and whats in the cc.

[Diegoxx]

people would just use first attack to scout (find out where traps, whats in cc, etc) then on second attack 3 star the guy so no

[Contender570]

This was implemented when wars started. The stupidest thing i have seen in a game is someone complaining about a change that never occurred. If your lower member messed up an attack he shouldn't get a redo this would essentially mean i could scout a base and reattack it knowing where all traps teslas and whats in the cc.

That happens when someone else attacks besides the same person. I honestly never knew you couldnt attack the same person twice so dont get your panties in a bunch.

people would just use first attack to scout (find out where traps, whats in cc, etc) then on second attack 3 star the guy so no

Again, thats pretty much how attacking is when another player attacks a base who had a failed attack. Flawed system is flawed. If anything this would help the other clan because that would be one less attack on another base.

[andrgin]

If your lowest member fails his attack and this costs you the war, this means you either did a horrible job planning the attacks or your other attackers really suck. Every th7 is a free 3 star because every th7 should have dragons and there is no way to fail a dragon attack at th7. With this many attacks left you should easily be able to clear the bottom ones.

In our clans the th7s do not only clean all the th7s and below, they also have to hit up at the low th8s with their second attack (or maybe even their first if they think they are strong enough.

[Amindha77]

You get no second chances in war.