Dominance Experiment: Clan War Engineering (x Vs. 2x)

[Reav3R]

Hmmm... I've been lurking in this thread and the recent discussions on fastest clan xp has got me considering the 25v50 option. I have 20 active accounts and it would only take a short while to get 5 more going. Getting the 25 "dead" TH3 would take work and friends to get them created legally, but could probably be done.

Any opinions/speculation on whether the clan would ever make a valid match with 25 minimum TH3 accounts? The other 25 would be normal spread from Max TH10 and down...

I imagine the problem with big wars with very low accounts would be finding matches. It might take long to find matches and they might be heavily unbalanced (in enemy clan's favor) but still winnable. If you can control that many accounts yourself, go for it.

[Flubber41]

I find the experiment somewhat interesting. It might very well be one of the more efficient ways to gain clan XP.

The way this is engineered I am not at all shocked that he is a achieving perfect wars . Essentially you need the ability to three star a max th8 with a max offense th8 . I assume the OP ps pretty skilled so I not surprised he can do this . I consider myself only moderately skilled and I manage this with a high success rate .

I know this is an experiement but ultimately seems a pretty boring way to proceed ( alone and with really one challenging Attack at all of the 10 you must do every way ). I will check in though to see how it goes .

on matching
1. I think it is pretty clear that overall clan weight is the first and biggest factor
2. I believe there are a number of other secondary tests designed to prevent the impossible wars that could come from a average only ..
3 matching for us has been great lately ..

[Bacdar]

I'm not interested in the fastest or most efficient way to earn clan exp but I'm very interested in the always win concept.

Wouldn't it be a good idea to replace one of your Fake TH3 accounts with a defenseless TH9 account?

Yes I know it's very painful to set up a defenseless TH9 account and it's obnoxious to maintain it (farming elixer for your war army)

Reason I ask is because I don't believe a Max TH8 can 3 Star a Max TH8 consequently 100% of the time. As I saw in your War Log you 1starred a TH8 and he 1starred you in return.

Okay in the end you still won the war but in theory it's still risky.

Your thoughts?

[Reav3R]

I'm not interested in the fastest or most efficient way to earn clan exp but I'm very interested in the always win concept.

Wouldn't it be a good idea to replace one of your Fake TH3 accounts with a defenseless TH9 account?

Yes I know it's very painful to set up a defenseless TH9 account and it's obnoxious to maintain it (farming elixer for your war army)

Reason I ask is because I don't believe a Max TH8 can 3 Star a Max TH8 consequently 100% of the time. As I saw in your War Log you 1starred a TH8 and he 1starred you in return.

Okay in the end you still won the war but in theory it's still risky.

Your thoughts?

Only if you can endure the trouble of maintaining such account. I wouldn't say it's necessary because you don't NEED 30 stars to win a war, with this combination you will be mostly matched against broken clans who would lose anyway. Technically, you can win a 10v war with max xp with only 10 stars.

[athancoreextreme]

too troublesome....i'd rather have an entry level TH9 account wherein at least it can defend against the general farming attacks and keep some loot for me so that I can save for heroes / troops...

Only if you can endure the trouble of maintaining such account. I wouldn't say it's necessary because you don't NEED 30 stars to win a war, with this combination you will be mostly matched against broken clans who would lose anyway. Technically, you can win a 10v war with max xp with only 10 stars.

[Bacdar]

I noticed that your Max TH4 accounts one has 27 walls and one got 26 walls why is that? Is this a typo or is there a reason behind this?

[Reav3R]

I noticed that your Max TH4 accounts one has 27 walls and one got 26 walls why is that? Is this a typo or is there a reason behind this?

That one wall can distract (path) WBs for long enough to get crushed by valk/loon if you put it in front of others. Usually doesn't matter much based on the low experience of enemies.

[Bacdar]

That one wall can distract (path) WBs for long enough to get crushed by valk/loon if you put it in front of others. Usually doesn't matter much based on the low experience of enemies.

If that's true why not have 27 walls in both TH4 accounts?

Edit: nvm I got it cause of CC troops. Hmmmmmmm.

[Reav3R]

If that's true why not have 27 walls in both TH4 accounts?

Edit: nvm I got it cause of CC troops. Hmmmmmmm.

Because unless they're the absolute worst clan in the world, they're not gonna fall for the same trick twice. Also, chance of bringing WBs is already low anyway. But since one wall wouldn't make much of a difference, I decided to put it anyway.

[Bacdar]

In my old days I remember barching enemy bases 2 tiers higher than me and getting angry it didn't work

This happened more than 2 times

I think a TH3 / TH4 would definitely fall for the same trick again unless the bases look identical but I checked yours and they are a little different.