A 2 star 50% attack or a 1* 99% attack? The change log is very vague about and does not say which one will get counted toward total destruction of a base.
A 2 star 50% attack or a 1* 99% attack? The change log is very vague about and does not say which one will get counted toward total destruction of a base.
the 99% because its a percent and not stars
It is percentage from best attack. So 2 stars is better then one. So 2 star 50 percent takes precedent.
We're having conflicting ideas about this already. Can anyone who've already encountered a tie answer this?
you just contradicted yourselfOriginally Posted by B425lsu
When you attack in a war it's the best attack on the bases that count. The best attack on a base is determined by:
1st)the number of stars
2nd)its percentage
So a 2* 50% would take precedence over 1* 99%.
the question wasnt for best attack, it was for total destruction percentage
The question was clearly about the new tiebreaker system.
The "total destruction % " for that is based on best attack on each base. Where "best" is number of stars first, then % damage.
Tie breaker % is average of "best" attack on each base, and best attack is determined by stars then %. Alex, anthony, |||||||||| and B425 are right.
You don't need to wait for a tie to confirm this. Just go to the defence tab for your opponents and check what happens when a base is 2 starred after previously being 1 starred. The best attack will change from the 1 star result to the 2 star result, regardless of %.
And twister makes a very good point about base targetting strategy late in a close war. Read his comments carefully.
Clan for drop-in TH13 FCs clan EU, #P2LLRJ22
IGN : iftheskyisblue
CoC : Les Metaliques | TH13
BB : EU X | HQ24
just look in the defense tab it shows you
CJ #QUG2YVC TH10 LEVEL 143, CJ 2ND ACCOUNT #2G8RRPVO TH9 LVL 119
CLAN: FLARITY CLAN LV11 373 WINS
BK: LV 30, AQ:LV 38 BK: LV 22, AQ:LV 30
627WAR STARS 728 WAR STARS
979M GG, 1B EE, 5.3M HH; 660M GG, 690M EE, 2.95M HH
Posting Permissions
