Crumbsole:
So far, I refrained from commenting on your clan ranking by level/perks list, but since you are here to not only to criticize OP, but also hijack the thread by inserting your list, here is my opinion: nobody gives a s*it about your ranking. Nobody really cares, as can be shown by the fact that you are the only one constantly bumping your stupid thread. Clan ranking by perks are mainly dependent on clan size, frequency of war and when the clan started war when the perks were first introduced. It has nothing to do with skill, therefore, your list is meaningless.
yes you are wight it was not my intention to do so , just want to gibe information , but the result was what you said so , please excuse me.
well i'd checked every time the views before to update and the views next day, base on this there are 300 forum users that are interesting in my "stupid thread".
also , SUPERCELL has create PERKS system ingame, and as far as i know they did not create rankings like yours, so MAYBE , SC wants people to play based on clans perks and want to enphatised the SOCIAL part of the game.
I bet Supercell did not include such ranking to avoid frustration (people may get frustrated and quit if their clan is not included in the leaderboard and it can't be fixed easily). Or may be they just don't think it is interesting actually.
On the other hand clan perks were introduced to increase clan war activity. More clans participate - more accurate match can be found. I think clan level is not a good measure for war performance. Though I don't say it is useless of not interesting.
after too many time playing this game i'd realized that one of his goals its to allow multiple games in one, that is
you can play to try to get the highest account level or
the highest live as sigle player
or even the highest number of war stars, and soo on
As group player you can try to be in a "famose" clan, could be the highest troffee clan or the highest win or as the highest perk clan.
so there is too many games just taking in game numbers , so if you make the question :
Who is the best COC player? there is no answer.
or
Which is the best clan? neither
NOW we can only make
like wich is the clan with more victories or who is the player with more war stars.
there are direct answers in game like
Who is the best player in troffee? ARIES with 4979
Which is the 2th best clan in troffee? Arab champions with 47777
thats easy to see , but other cathegories are a little harder so thats the reason i'd made the list, and also i think you did your list for the same reason.
despite of this, its just an subjetive criteria to follow one or the other list. i had my reasons to do my list. if you want we can start a new thread to try to get a conclusion about what will be the paramethers to consider one clan its THE BEST, but i will beware you, it could be imposible, becouse the clans could be change his players in just a day, and SC can change the game. but i will be voluntier to post on that thread.
conclusion: if someone in any thread ask about a classification about wicth is the best clan, i will always send him to my list becouse i really think its as good as any, and i just try to help people.
P.D. if you had access to game database why not simply put a list of clans perk in your page? i will close inmediatly my thread becouse i am sure your page is much proffesional than my list.
Crumbsole:
Frankly, I don't get your obsession with clan perks, which is just an indication of clan activity and size. While your list does include some very good clans with very good record, it is a bit pretentious (and misleading) to claim something as subjective as '' these are the best clans''.
even OP, with his several lists using much more relevant data than clan perks, is not claiming that his lists are the best or they include all the best clans out there.
Well We tried to make Challenge Win Streak the most objective chart for war efficiency. It is not ideal (mainly it lacks clans that have lost a lot at the begging but now improved and have very long win streaks) but it is still very good and the best we could do.
Because it is not directly related to "war efficiency".