Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Low war wins, yet high clan levels

  1. #1
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    141

    Low war wins, yet high clan levels

    Is it fair to be a high level clan, like level 3-5, and only have won less than like ten wars? This is something we have been encountering a lot lately with our wars. One clan had won four wars yet was a clan level 3! I mean we have 29 soon to be 30 wins and we are a lv 4 clan, but we've earned this right through actual fighting! Not passably warring to earn levels! I just don't think it's fair. There should be a minimum number of war wins per clan level to reach the next one. I know people will disagree, and I'm okay with that. I just want to see what everyone else thinks of this...

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    3,987
    Nah I like how it is right now

    you only get much XPs if you star every base anyway, it's not like they are not actually warring at all

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,699
    I'm with you on this. Infact as a clan we were discussing this just the other day

    There's simply too much reward weighted in the 'taking part' aspect of war. Of course, now the whole thing has gained momentum it's impossible to change. It is what it is unfortunately

    Note: We warred a lvl6 clan with just 14 wins just recently. Go figure

  4. #4
    Pro Member Calin2015's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Silver I atm
    Posts
    668
    Yeap, the wins before perk update should had been counted.
    We reached lvl 5 clan with 70 wins
    Quote Originally Posted by Biotec View Post
    Strongly recommend TH 1.5. Don't build your cannon.
    Quote Originally Posted by Flunkos View Post
    We told one of our newer members to lightning the cc....He dropped a lightning spell on the actual cc - no luring the troops or anything. Guess we should have been more specific...
    Clan: Romania Knights (#LGYGGVJQ) IGN: Calin2015

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    452
    No that would be horrible if you didn't get any experience from a loss. What if a clan lost by one star. And they get no experience!

    You forget the vast majority of the clash player base are casual and to penalize all these clans who may not win many wars is not just mean but bad business.

    Besides what are you worried about. The level upgrade perk? It doesn't give an advantage not available to anyone anyway.

  6. #6
    Forum Champion Smolson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    1 starring all of the bases in the galaxy
    Posts
    5,133
    I wouldn't consider level 3-5 a high clan level since there are 10 levels. Old clans end and new clans emerge every day. I think it's nice that new clans can reach some clan perks relatively quickly thus encouraging people to start new clans and new players to join those clans.

  7. #7
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Posts
    119
    Quote Originally Posted by ElToucan View Post
    No that would be horrible if you didn't get any experience from a loss. What if a clan lost by one star. And they get no experience!

    You forget the vast majority of the clash player base are casual and to penalize all these clans who may not win many wars is not just mean but bad business.

    Besides what are you worried about. The level upgrade perk? It doesn't give an advantage not available to anyone anyway.
    I agree. Plus, the benefits of higher clan levels would make those winning clans OP. And that would be boring for clans that like to war but arent as good at it, which might be the majority of them.
    |TH8.5 - lvl 104|121 legos|BK 10|AQ 10|GG/EE 360/345KK|
    |Diskheads #89QLJPUG
    - recruiting TH5 and up|
    |War: twice a
    week| diskheads.weebly.com

  8. #8
    Senior Member Duckbill77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    359
    Quote Originally Posted by Zappygirl85 View Post
    Is it fair to be a high level clan, like level 3-5, and only have won less than like ten wars? This is something we have been encountering a lot lately with our wars. One clan had won four wars yet was a clan level 3! I mean we have 29 soon to be 30 wins and we are a lv 4 clan, but we've earned this right through actual fighting! Not passably warring to earn levels! I just don't think it's fair. There should be a minimum number of war wins per clan level to reach the next one. I know people will disagree, and I'm okay with that. I just want to see what everyone else thinks of this...
    Try run a game that you gain nothing if you lose, see how many people would like to stay?

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Posts
    1,699
    Quote Originally Posted by smolson View Post
    I wouldn't consider level 3-5 a high clan level since there are 10 levels. Old clans end and new clans emerge every day. I think it's nice that new clans can reach some clan perks relatively quickly thus encouraging people to start new clans and new players to join those clans.
    We should hand out 'Thanks for trying' stickers and 'Sorry you lost' lollipops too

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    274
    There aren't any unbalancing perks until level 5 and the number of lost wars you would have to participate in to get there is ridiculous. Let those dedicated enough to spend that much gold and elixir to succeed at this strategy have their perk. It's not much different than those with the willpower to snipe to Titans. Also, consider the benefit to all those other clans that most likely got an easy clan war win with all the loot and xp points to go with it. Good on 'em, I say.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •