They're my go-to troop in war at TH9. I think I would miss them.
(They're better than just the simple GoWiVa attacks)
9.9
They're my go-to troop in war at TH9. I think I would miss them.
(They're better than just the simple GoWiVa attacks)
9.9
Titan: TH10
Best: Champions III (3276)
Clan: I LIKE GOLD
Failure is the embers to success
Spell of Protection
10
Used right at th9, valks are probably the most reliable 2-3 star strategy against max th9s.
10 because if SC does that with her what will stop them from going for other troops? I would quit really.
1, but I'd like to see them get better. They'd be the perfect troop to start adding "auras" to. How cool would valk be if they had a war cry that gave other troops near them a little passive boost.
No, please don't.Originally Posted by Tvsever
If a troop provides a boost on other troops then that should be it's main function. Like healers doing healing. A troop with significant offensive capability shouldn't have a secondary passive effect.
It's a slippery slope and before you know it armies will have to include 2 or 3 troops just to get their passive effect. Collecting buffs is a stupid mechanic that should be kept exclusive to MMORPGs.
Ignore list: rydogg20 bouges jarvee nerfedname Rampantarmadillo JohnSnow83 Vikky CriPpLeR RakeNoris ClashRoyaleTeam AsyanHari
...except hero's, it's ok with hero, and every other RTS
If done correctly it won't be OP don't get your panties in a bunch.
Iron fist is only a temporal boost and also manually activated....except hero's, it's ok with hero, and every other RTS
If done correctly it won't be OP don't get your panties in a bunch.
It's just not a good fit for a troop like valk. If they want to add something like that to a new troop and it's done properly then fine.
Ignore list: rydogg20 bouges jarvee nerfedname Rampantarmadillo JohnSnow83 Vikky CriPpLeR RakeNoris ClashRoyaleTeam AsyanHari
I can't believe this thread is 10 pages long.
Boshrankus- Co-Leader of Invictus Beasts
Invictus Kings ◘ Lords ◘ Beasts ◘ Nobles ◘ Fire
RECRUITMENT ➡ ON ✔
Removing troops is a bad idea, imagine if they decided Dragons or Wizards didn't need to be used.
I played a (terrible) online space game many years ago.
Each week they forced change on players, by changing up the troops (well they were ships, but same idea)
* Most commonly used troop - Removed from game for one week
* Second most commonly used troop - PERMANENT 10% stats decrease
* Third most commonly used troop - 10% cost increase
* Second least commonly used troops - 10% cost decrease
* Least commonly used troops - PERMANENT 10% stats increase
That way they balanced the less used troops over time
Removed troops was pretty funny, as it tended to alternate a particular troop on/off (when it returned people built it as much as possible!)
It meant that people returning to the game after a month had a bit of a struggle getting the game to behave how they wanted.
WHY WOULD YOU THINK OF SUCH A THING. cough cough GOWIVA cough cough
Posting Permissions
