Multiple or Single Inferno Tower?

[ZeeFleming]

Pretty easy question.

Probably pretty personal to how you like your base defended, but what does everybody prefer?

Why do you prefer one over the other?

[DarkRises]

Multiple, cause singles can be easily tanked by Golem/Hound

[Cowbug]

Multiple, cause singles can be easily tanked by Golem/Hound

Singles actually chew golems, pekkas and hounds up in no time, better to use fewer large tanks and more small tanks (Giants) or witches on single. I still prefer multi cause it takes out the wiz and skellies faster.

[rons]

i don't like attacking bases with multiple inferno.. it's hard for me.

[Camja11]

In general, multi.

However as you climb up in trophies you get attacked more and more by golems, hounds, and max level heros. Single infernos deal with these troops extremely efficiently.

i think it depends on your base layout and what you are expecting to be attacked by.

[Dresden]

It blocks whatever it's attacking from being able to be healed, so if you're getting Giant-Barched, the multi may help the rest of your towers to clean out their tanks. Against high HP troops like golems and Pekkas, single target is WAAAAY better.

[cargovroomvroom]

Multiple, because there are two infernos and not just one.

[vivian265]

Single IFs are incredibly strong but up against mass troops it stands no chance. It's a waste if it targets single archers. Therefore I prefer multi set IFs.

[Johnnysks]

High leagues, mix. Use the single to force people to come from the other side (most choose to raid from multi side).

[Rice1o5]

Multi is harder I think