View Poll Results: How is my idea?

Voters
241. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, I like this idea

    157 65.15%
  • No, I do not like this idea

    45 18.67%
  • I like this idea, but needs fixes(Please specify)

    39 16.18%
Page 28 of 47 FirstFirst ... 18262728293038 ... LastLast
Results 271 to 280 of 470

Thread: New Troop: CANNONEER!

  1. #271
    New Guy
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    47
    I would like to make this look like a smaller mortar with a giant pulling it and placing the shells in to it. Also knock it down in destruction per second. Way to strong. It shouldn't be able to destroy a defense in 3 to 4 hits and decrease the defense ability.

  2. #272
    Senior Member Greg1988's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Making Signatures on Photoshop.
    Posts
    485
    Nice idea! You obviously put a lot of thought into this.

    "Some walls are made of fear, but some are made of wall material."

    Click on my signature to view my shop
    Befriend me?



  3. #273
    Forum Veteran jaronhudson15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sitting near a fire with some Barbarians and Valkyries(\/alhalla)
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by jollyjunior89 View Post
    I would like to make this look like a smaller mortar with a giant pulling it and placing the shells in to it. Also knock it down in destruction per second. Way to strong. It shouldn't be able to destroy a defense in 3 to 4 hits and decrease the defense ability.

    I understand your concern, but many other troops are also capable of destroying defenses in 2-4 hits. Maxed wizards are able to destroy a max Cannon in about 4-5 Hits, as well as the Archer Queen; add her royal cloak on top of that.

    The Cannoneer moves slow, and fires off a shot slower than a Wizard(A group of Wizards would be capable of destroying a defense quicker than a Cannoneer)

    Here are things to consider: Let's say we compare a group of Wizards to the Cannoneer. More wizards would be able to destroy a defense quicker than one Cannoneer, given that you are able to have 6 Wizards for every Cannoneer. But, the Wizards would need to get closer to their target and risk taking damage from other defenses.

    The Cannoneer is bigger and slower than a Wizard. You can risk losing a couple wizards in a group of six, since three or four are perfectly capable of dealing a lot of damage. But if you lose one Cannoneer out of two or three, it might make a difference in the raid. The Cannoneer needs to be toward the back of your army and protected.
    For more of that power or extra tanking each raid, you could swap out a Cannoneer for a Pekka. If you want a supportive/assult/ranged troop, you might do the opposite.

    As for the look of the troop, it really doesn't matter. All that matters is the concept, if we were to see a very similar troop concept this upcoming update, I'd still be glad to see it, regardless.

  4. #274
    Forum Veteran jaronhudson15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sitting near a fire with some Barbarians and Valkyries(\/alhalla)
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by Greg1988 View Post
    Nice idea! You obviously put a lot of thought into this.
    Happy to see that you like it. Let me know if you have any questions later on.

  5. #275
    Super Member OMCKG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    At Farming's Funeral
    Posts
    925
    interesting idea. but wouldn't it be hard to protect if it chases after defenses?
    12/10/2015. The start of the great clash depression.
    The day farming died.

  6. #276
    Forum Veteran jaronhudson15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sitting near a fire with some Barbarians and Valkyries(\/alhalla)
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by OMCKG View Post
    interesting idea. but wouldn't it be hard to protect if it chases after defenses?
    Glad you like it. As for protecting and funneling, it would be completely up to you on how you would use it. If you're able to funnel pretty well and you know what you're doing, it might not be so hard.

    Let me know if you have any questions in the future.

  7. #277
    Trainee
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    22

    Oops

    This troop seems like it is overpowered and wouldn't dosent even up the playing field

  8. #278
    Forum Veteran jaronhudson15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sitting near a fire with some Barbarians and Valkyries(\/alhalla)
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by pjbutler1010 View Post
    This troop seems like it is overpowered and wouldn't dosent even up the playing field
    Sorry you think so, mind explaining why?

  9. #279
    Forum Veteran LordBrunothefirst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    1,956
    Wow I am completely blown away at how good this idea is lol... I was also wondering would this be a slower troop or have more speed to it? Because you said it would work good with a rage/haste spell.


  10. #280
    Forum Veteran jaronhudson15's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Sitting near a fire with some Barbarians and Valkyries(\/alhalla)
    Posts
    1,797
    Quote Originally Posted by LordBrunothefirst View Post
    Wow I am completely blown away at how good this idea is lol... I was also wondering would this be a slower troop or have more speed to it? Because you said it would work good with a rage/haste spell.
    I'm happy to know that you like it.

    Well, it is a slower troop. It would work well with a Haste or Rage since they both provide a speed boost, and could benefit the Cannoneer's supportive role of weakening defenses.

    Let me know if you have any questions later on.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •