New Troop: CANNONEER!

[jaronhudson15]

Jaron, since a lot of people think the troop is too strong, instead of making the expense higher and the making the troop weaker. Why don't you just increase the housing space? Maybe to 30 or 35. Would make it fit better to me.

Thanks for the suggestion, but I don't think people would be willing to swap out a tank troop for a weaker HP, and long ranged defense targeting troop. People may not find it beneficial for an army since people really rely on tanks and more offense troops.

Increasing Housing Space would cause people to not have enough room for other supportive/Offensive troops. I think 25HS is perfect for a Long range, lower DPS, ranged defense targeter. If I were to lower it, it might be too strong, if I raised it, it may not be worth using.

Let me know if you have any more Questions/Concerns/Suggestions about the Cannoneer.

[Temur]

Then I would decrease the HP a little

[jaronhudson15]

Then I would decrease the HP a little

I'll put it into consideration, but I want it to stand a better chance against the poison spell.

[MyAncestorWasAPEKKA]

Do the effects of the Cannoneer stack? Ex. If I train up 2 max Cannoneers, and they target the same defense, will the damage decrease be 80%? If so, it would be way to OP.

[Temur]

Do the effects of the Cannoneer stack? Ex. If I train up 2 max Cannoneers, and they target the same defense, will the damage decrease be 80%? If so, it would be way to OP.

I can't find where it says they cannot stack, so yeah I guess it does stack and that would be a little OP.

[jaronhudson15]

I can't find where it says they cannot stack, so yeah I guess it does stack and that would be a little OP.

I guess I cannot decide whether or not I want to have stack effects. There are not any right now, if there were then I would have definitely added it in the summary section. I guess I don't want there to be any stacking; If two or more Cannoneer's are firing on a single defense, then only a single Cannoneer will decrease the damage of the defense.

Do me a favor, and do not assume characteristics on my thread. If there are any special characteristics that could change the way people look or use this troop, then I would absolutely add it in. If there aren't any specific statistics, then it simply does not exist within the troop's capabilities.
Ask questions if you're unsure of things.

Let me know if you have any more Questions/Concerns about the idea.

[Temur]

I was just saying that I could not find where it says they cannot stack, so obviously after checking a couple of times, I would conclude that these troops can stack. What else would I think, that they sat down all day eating cannon balls and reading a magazine

[jaronhudson15]

I was just saying that I could not find where it says they cannot stack, so obviously after checking a couple of times, I would conclude that these troops can stack. What else would I think, that they sat down all day eating cannon balls and reading a magazine

Please no longer comment on the idea. You should know better than to conclude to obvious, overpowered ideas that would make the idea look bad, or even insult by making a mockery of its nature. Not including the ridiculous magazine comment, you are not making very practical idea choices that I think would benefit the idea, and I would appreciate it if you would stop commenting unless you have suggestions or statements relating to what is "listed within thread".

This does not go for my thread alone, please respect other people's ideas and do not assume or mock other ideas in any way.

[Temur]

Please no longer comment on the idea. You should know better than to conclude to obvious, overpowered ideas that would make the idea look bad, or even insult by making a mockery of its nature. Not including the ridiculous magazine comment, you are not making very practical idea choices that I think would benefit the idea, and I would appreciate it if you would stop commenting unless you have suggestions or statements relating to what is "listed within thread".

This does not go for my thread alone, please respect other people's ideas and do not assume or mock other ideas in any way.

Very sorry, did not mean to insult, was not thinking rightWill not post in this idea again

[Asmdus88]

Please no longer comment on the idea. You should know better than to conclude to obvious, overpowered ideas that would make the idea look bad, or even insult by making a mockery of its nature. Not including the ridiculous magazine comment, you are not making very practical idea choices that I think would benefit the idea, and I would appreciate it if you would stop commenting unless you have suggestions or statements relating to what is "listed within thread".

This does not go for my thread alone, please respect other people's ideas and do not assume or mock other ideas in any way.

This goes both ways you know, you don't need to be so uptight about the criticism or suggestions you might recieve, ecspecially considering you tend to be very critical and micro scrutinizing of other threads when you comment. Ijs