
Originally Posted by
AxionXD
It's a secondary response based on something that is a company policy not to reveal.
Even on this forum, you are not allowed to discuss any punitive actions that you've been issued. Likewise, I'm sure their Customer Support team is also not allowed to discuss punitive actions that have been issued to players other than the player being punished.
If it is a normal customer support issue, absolutely, there should be secondary follow ups. That's not the question.
The topic of discussion here is reporting suspected exploiters. Since Supercell has a policy not to name and shame anyone, guilty or innocent, what would a secondary response consist of in the case of reporting a player who is exploiting the game?
"I can't tell you what happened, but something happened, have a great day!"
While that may make you feel warm and fuzzy inside, I bet their Customer Support is buried deep enough that this would be considered a bit wasteful. Also, in the grand scheme of it, ny saying that "something happened" doesn't that imply that they banned the user?
So how would you respond as a secondary follow up without revealing what punitive actions befell on the reported user, that wasn't covered by the initial response?