Can coc designers make a version of coc that we can see other side of building and rotate 3D and controll troops like relic games? This will be a big huge game making project i hope to its made ...sorry for bad eng ...
Can coc designers make a version of coc that we can see other side of building and rotate 3D and controll troops like relic games? This will be a big huge game making project i hope to its made ...sorry for bad eng ...
And either of these are needed WHY?Originally Posted by hameddesighn
Troop control makes the game no longer strategy, just stupid, and what is the point of seeing the back of my army camp?
My best threads: The Overseer, Flying Shark,Shockwave Spell, Empusa, FLAMEingo
I had the idea of making CoC playable on PC via Steam, but just the original version, not what you are suggesting. If anything, just make or download a mod for something like (not trying to advertise) Minecraft or Garry's Mod that does what you suggest.
Company of Heroes,
Company of Heroes 2,
Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War,
Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War II,
Homeworld
this games all from relic .co and the style of gaming is based on 3d strategy and alway are in high ranked of strategy games , and i dont know supercell wants to be a better game or not , oh yea! Supercell wants to stay in 2d world for 100 years! :|
SC has stated that they have no intent to port their games to any of the aforementioned systems.
2013, Relic was purchased by Sega for $26 million. From what I can gather, they bought the entire company not just a controlling share.
2014, SoftBank purchased 51% of Supercell for $1.5 billion.
Trust me, Relic wishes it could be Supercell. Especially when Relic does not own IP for Homeland or Warhammer, merely licenses their use.
Clash of Clans is far easier to develop, maintain and update then a full PC game with 20GB download worth of gaming and graphics data while Clash of Clans is able to contain itself to around 50MB...
Last edited by AxionXD; July 21st, 2015 at 06:31 PM.
This coc is a social game and its different I'm talking about 3D version of coc and its not a change its a new realize , all we know that relic games are more perfected with all respect but in 3d design coc textures are so beginner , Game scale measurement is not trade and money , graet game is not who's most sold ...
Your example like google stock , I think that 1precent of google stock must be more expensiver that All of coc ...
Actually, with Google worth (rounded) $300 Billion, 1% literally pays for the $3 billion worth of Supercell.
I never commented on the actual idea itself. I understand your suggested recommendation.
It'd be an interesting game to play but it would be something completely different then Clash of Clans.
I don't think they should dilute their branding either by trying to expand to related/branded games just to milk the Clash of Clans franchise. Angry Birds did it and now they make more money from merchandising then the game itself. Personally, I wouldn't care where the money came from but if you are proud of your game, you don't want to dilute it's brand impact.
True, it's not about how many copies you sell but when you aren't even technically selling your game and you are able to make $5 million in sales a day, you're doing something right.
Don't fix what ain't broke, as they say.
Last edited by AxionXD; July 21st, 2015 at 08:03 PM.
Gamers request ! Game designers must pay attention to gamers , the 2D version of coc is all free and haves ingame purchases , but between this huge amount of player who buy'ed gems?(i bought 500) i think 2D coc now stick in gamers hearts , and i promise if a good 3d version , like coh tales of valor realized with a expensive price it will stoled with a huge number of clients ..
But why take a risk if such a version fails? All business moves have a risk, and that sounds far too risky.
Posting Permissions
