"I'm Maxed out TH x except"

[DaOneNOnly799]

Disregard the pointless lab upgrades such as goblins..

[bbdoc]

Maybe people don't want to start writing a full book on how far they are with upgrading their village, so they use the term "maxed" as far as they are maxed defs.

I personnally have my defs maxed (or at least I had, still working on the new sweeper we got in last update), heroes maxed, but still 75 zap walls to go, but I do consider myself as maxed. I'll probably be finished with my zap in a few weeks, but will still not have maxed all my troops (especially with the 3 new dark spells)... but still will consider myself as maxed ;-)

[Itzmeetwad]

I honestly think people claim the "maxed except" title to feel better about their not having done walls or heroes imo till all defences heroes and walls are done you are not maxed, and the maxed defences titles shouldn't even apply since walls are defences, I'm th9 lvl 30 queen, bk26 180 lavas and I am not maxed. They should use " I have maxed all defensive buildings" which. Would be accepted easier then "I got the easy stuff done so I'm maxed except those"

[Squall9010]

I honestly think people claim the "maxed except" title to feel better about their not having done walls or heroes imo till all defences heroes and walls are done you are not maxed. And the maxed defences titles shouldn't even apply since walls are defences. I'm th9 lvl 30 queen, bk26 180 lavas and I am not maxed.

So giants and wallbreakers should have the same ai.... Sure, whatever.

[Superfinch30]

I am happy with the term maxed for defences.

Walls and heroes too would be 'full max'. How I've always seen it.

I certainly prefer those to: 'early', 'mid', well developed 10. Because all of those would be completely opposing mixtures of wall, hero, troop and def levels.

You could have an early 10 with comparatively good defences, but shocking heroes, troops and walls. They would be the worst kind of war liability.
But an 'early th10' could also be a 9.5 with no infernos, monster heroes and walls, and thus be optimal for war.

[Saleh47]

I only have few levels for king, few for sweeper, some traps and many upgrades in lab to be fully maxed without exception.

If someone asks me are you maxed the easiest answer is either no (could mean rushed which isn't the case) or yes I'm maxed except king,sweepers and lab. It is not saying I'm fully maxed then full stop.

[TimZim]

the x.5 concept is as badly mangled as the 'max' by people.

Just saying...

Maxed, except... is not maxed. By definition.

[Squall9010]

the x.5 concept is as badly mangled as the 'max' by people.

Just saying...

Maxed, except... is not maxed. By definition.

Exactly, thus saying 'max except' is saying you aren't maxed. Common sense really.

[Superfinch30]

the x.5 concept is as badly mangled as the 'max' by people.

Just saying...

Maxed, except... is not maxed. By definition.

Bravo. Less than maxed is not maxed. Excellent detective work.

It is a quick point of reference. If you have time or need to explain fully, then by all means do.
I just find that early, mid, late/strong are just as woolly.

I'm over 12,000 raids in, and still not full max th10.
Have 6 whole hero levels I have no desire to do due to back-to-back war, and 70 lavas to turn zap.

I'd assume that qualifies as very late/strong th10.
Would 30/30 heroes, lv12 defs and Lego/lava mix not also qualify as a strong th10 though? As I know which id rather have or attack.

[SirBlake]

I find it difficult to understand why people have such a strong reaction over the way a base is being described.

If someone says a base is 'maxed, except walls and heroes' then it's safe to say that's exactly how it is. This sort of description can be easily pictured in the mind of whoever is reading it.

Some, I feel, are getting way too hung up over this.