5 star system

[Andreh]

What is the 5 star system for?
-distinguish quality attacks and lucky/bad attacks;
-decrease war ties;
-loose/win the appropriate amount of loot in war and of trophies on trophy-pushing.


How does it work?

Winning star criteria	Good attacks that will get more stars	Exemples	Bad attacks that will get less stars
TH down (1 star)	-	-	-
50% (1 star)	-	-	-
All defences down (1 star) NEW	Attacks where you destroyed all the defences with troops with favourite target of defence and they don't have time to 100% the base.	Hog rider mass	Attacks where the attacker only worry about the TH and 50%
75% (1 star) NEW	Attacks where the troops forget the TH and go around the base.	Dragon mass, GoWiPe (when the P.E.K.K.As go around)	Attacks where the attacker only worry about the TH and 50%
100% (1 star)	-	-	-

What can you comment to help?
If you disagree:
-comment why
-suggest an idea to improve
If you agree:
-let me know
-tell me if there is a way to improve

[zachUVA]

I know the point of this is to reward better attacks, but it goes way too far. In particular, this would really hurt TH 10s, where 3 of the 5 stars are very difficult to win in normal matchmaking (not easy in war either). So now a succesful attacks (50%+TH being a success) gets you 2/3 of the trophies offered, and your proposal would reduce that to 2/5... that's a big difference.

I feel like this is something that might would be ok at mid level THs, but it's just not balanced at the high end IMO.

[Darian21]

It's a good idea but.. 5 stars! It's TOO MUCH! I think 3 stars is better.

[Tamerlanecoc]

It's a good idea but.. 5 stars! It's TOO MUCH! I think 3 stars is better.

3 star system is fine. I just don't see a problem with it.

[Kingzenith]

It's a good concept. I do believe they should change it up as far as victory over a base is concerned.

[Andreh]

I know the point of this is to reward better attacks, but it goes way too far. In particular, this would really hurt TH 10s, where 3 of the 5 stars are very difficult to win in normal matchmaking (not easy in war either). So now a succesful attacks (50%+TH being a success) gets you 2/3 of the trophies offered, and your proposal would reduce that to 2/5... that's a big difference.

I feel like this is something that might would be ok at mid level THs, but it's just not balanced at the high end IMO.

The thing is: there are some attacks wich are really good and they count like some lucky attacks! If someone makes more than 2 stars; ir would be a great attack and will make a huge diference in wars.

[Andreh]

It's a good concept. I do believe they should change it up as far as victory over a base is concerned.

[Andreh]

Anyone? Help with ideas!

[devil9394]

Hello. I don't think this is a good idea, I like the current system as it is. Awarding people a star for destroying all the defences is not such a big deal; such attacks are not a successful one but a failed one. If the attacker focused too much on destroying all the defences, yet he didn't take any clean-up troops, then it is his own mistake and pays for it by not getting the 3rd star (currently). These guys shouldn't be rewarded for their fail, because it is a fail, with a star.
Also as mentioned above, this would really disadvantage TH10s. There are a lot of bases and cases for th10s when they even struggle to get the 2nd star for 50%.. a 75% is nearly impossible to achieve on high level players, nor it is possible for th10s to destroy all the defences. All a th10 will get after this is, like zachUVA said, 2/5 stars.