Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 70

Thread: penalize people who leave clan in the middle of war without attacking

  1. #51
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    490
    There is really nothing that can be done in this case, but being preventive.

    1) Never let anyone new in the clan that isn't eligible for war (meaning they already left their previous clans in the middle of war)

    2) Don't go to war with new members

    This way you lower that chances of members leaving your clan in the middle of war.
    Last edited by tellingthetruth; May 31st, 2015 at 06:13 AM.

  2. #52
    Senior Member rhgreen82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    www.darkthieves.com
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by Jubi View Post
    Goodness, what is the practical difference between someone who flakes during war by not showing up, showing up and BARCHing, attacking way too high or low, cursing you out....or bailing without attacking?

    None at all. Worthless is worthless.

    Every time you bring a new guy to war with you, there's a risk that he will flake out on you. If someone flakes, you lose those attacks regardless. It's actually better if the flaky new guy just bails out, because then it's 100 percent clear that you need to cover for him.

    If you want to mitigate your risk, go with smaller wars and only bring in one or two new prospects, whom your trusted folks can cover for, at any given time. I'd also recommend having new folks observe a war and socialize with the team a little bit before you let them war with you.
    There is no difference what so ever. But least with my idea if there not active and didn't fight gives the next clan a fair heads up.

  3. #53
    Pro Member Jubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    524
    Quote Originally Posted by rhgreen82 View Post
    There is no difference what so ever. But least with my idea if there not active and didn't fight gives the next clan a fair heads up.
    Well, much as we'd like to brand everyone who flakes out on us with a Scarlet letter (H for Hopper, B for BARCHer, S for Sniper, N for No-show, R for Rude, etc.) it's not really practical--you wouldn't probably think it was fair to have someone's negative judgment follow you around if you tried to joined a group and decided it wasn't a good fit. Team dynamics is important--I can hardly fault someone for leaving us if we aren't clicking. Why hang around with folks who aren't fun to play with?

    Why would you want to FORCE someone that you already know doesn't want to hang around you, that you can't trust to act on behalf of the team, to go to war with you? What a nightmare that would be...!

    The guy who leaves in the middle of war without attacking is already penalized by not being able to participate in another war until yours ends. But if you make him hang out and chat with your clanmates for a couple of days before gambling on his suitability as a teammate in war, then both parties should have a better idea of whether his continuing to hang around is worth it.

  4. #54
    Centennial Club Oneyed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Today Is A Gift, That's Why It's Called The Present. 🎁
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by tellingthetruth View Post
    There is really nothing that can be done in this case, but being preventive.

    1) Never let anyone new in the clan that isn't eligible for war (meaning they already left their previous clans in the middle of war)

    2) Don't go to war with new members

    This way you lower that chances of members leaving your clan in the middle of war.
    No there isn't anything that can be right now. But that's why the posts is up there. For somthing to be done by Supercell
    http://i.imgur.com/uueTUUm.png

  5. #55
    OzAudi
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Oneyed View Post
    No there isn't anything that can be right now. But that's why the posts is up there. For somthing to be done by Supercell
    SC doesn’t need to do anything. This thread is full of perfectly workable solutions that every clan leader can use. Some of you won’t adopt the tools in place because you want everyone else to change.

    Stop thinking everyone who plays the game differently from you is wrong. The people complained about here are playing with the game within the rules and have a valid reason to leave a clan.

    People who play within the rules should not be demonized. You may not agree with them and you entitled to a whinge but that is as far as it should go.

  6. #56
    Senior Member rhgreen82's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    www.darkthieves.com
    Posts
    349
    Quote Originally Posted by Jubi View Post
    Well, much as we'd like to brand everyone who flakes out on us with a Scarlet letter (H for Hopper, B for BARCHer, S for Sniper, N for No-show, R for Rude, etc.) it's not really practical--you wouldn't probably think it was fair to have someone's negative judgment follow you around if you tried to joined a group and decided it wasn't a good fit. Team dynamics is important--I can hardly fault someone for leaving us if we aren't clicking. Why hang around with folks who aren't fun to play with?

    Why would you want to FORCE someone that you already know doesn't want to hang around you, that you can't trust to act on behalf of the team, to go to war with you? What a nightmare that would be...!

    The guy who leaves in the middle of war without attacking is already penalized by not being able to participate in another war until yours ends. But if you make him hang out and chat with your clanmates for a couple of days before gambling on his suitability as a teammate in war, then both parties should have a better idea of whether his continuing to hang around is worth it.
    Think you read into my comments a little to much. Codes for what they did is crazy as well as dumb. And hes not already penalized at all. I have no idea how you come up with that dumb comment. You cant fight 2 wars at once there program wouldn't take it. They leave and are in a war of couse they cant join anther and except to fight right away.

    Supercell already show players when they have no league. Normally either when Season restarts or B there not active and havn't raided what I bring forward is no different but insted of a league badge a colour code. I dont think its perfect its an idea. ♥♥♥♥ other games you can look at players profile stats win losses so on to get a very very good idea of what is joining lets face it here in Clash its neally a lotto you don't see any bad stats what so ever!!!! U could have 700+ wars stars does that mean there good? Maybe or they drop low you never know.

    I run a group of clans we don't let anyone into our main clan with out testing at least min of one war before moving up. This way we can to see them in action and also follow our clan rules. I personal don't have a problem i just know 95% of other clans could do with help.

  7. #57
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Inside the town hall
    Posts
    72
    Instead of giving a penalty, i think it would be better for the to-be leaver, to be bound and tied to your clan until the war finishes.

  8. #58
    Centennial Club Oneyed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Today Is A Gift, That's Why It's Called The Present. 🎁
    Posts
    169
    Quote Originally Posted by OzAudi View Post
    SC doesn’t need to do anything. This thread is full of perfectly workable solutions that every clan leader can use. Some of you won’t adopt the tools in place because you want everyone else to change.

    Stop thinking everyone who plays the game differently from you is wrong. The people complained about here are playing with the game within the rules and have a valid reason to leave a clan.

    People who play within the rules should not be demonized. You may not agree with them and you entitled to a whinge but that is as far as it should go.

    ​No, SC doesn't have to do anything. But the dead can be put forward to them. I think it's a great idea to penalise someone fr leaving during war.
    http://i.imgur.com/uueTUUm.png

  9. #59
    Junior Member Thien026's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    70
    Unfortunately even if they do add a penalty, which I doubt they will, the member can just stay in the war and not attack. Then leave afterwards. And if you implement a penalty for those who don't attack, it'll hurt the good standing clan members who can't attack twice due to unforeseen circumstances.
    TH9 [] GG: 879 mil [] EE: 760mil [] HH: 2.91mil [] 220/250lavas 6/7/15

  10. #60
    OzAudi
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Oneyed View Post

    ​No, SC doesn't have to do anything. But the dead can be put forward to them. I think it's a great idea to penalise someone fr leaving during war.

    No. It’s an insane idea to penalize someone. To avoid the penalty they just have to stay. Penalty undone and the clan is no better off.
    To really get you back, they fill cc with wb until you kick and/or attack, wait thirty secs then resign. You kick. Clan is no better off and they are not penalized.

    Think through the possibilities first. They have been mentioned enough times.


    Besides, you don‘t know the circumstances but you want to penalize them ?? No wonder people would want to leave.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •