poll: should the air sweeper be changed to a trap?

[RagingKoala]

Making this defense invisible would greatly improve it's effectivness.

[andrgin]

Yes I thought the same. It would be a big surprise moment, but I think it is better this way. Dragon attacks should not be based on luck, but on skill.

[boomhower]

I do. As it is you just attack from behind it, not a massive adjustment. Not knowing which way it is facing or where it is before attack would be much more challenging.

[PrideFC]

It would be best (imo) if it faced one direction and then started spinning, confusing the attacker, but still locking onto one place.

[Nzo]

I don't think so.

It would make attacks too random and I have a feeling people would be frustrated with the "luck" around it. The second attacker in a war would be able to get 3 stars by simply attacking from another direction. With this new defensive tower that can potentially destroy a less-than-optimal army placement, you don't want that placement to be depending on luck of the draw.

[kmsoji]

yea its already pretty strong against dragons and loons, no need to make it invis too.

[RagingKoala]

If not invisible, what about not seeing what way its pointing?

[junyab]

Making this defense invisible would greatly improve it's effectiveness.

Couldn't you say that about every defense?

That aside, I think you should add reasoning for your poll, it would greatly improve its effectiveness.

[Hendu71]

No. I don't think it was meant as a surprise, or random. I think it is meant mainly as a deterrent (from approaches and troop composition). It wouldn't be a deterrent if you didn't know where it was.

[dbolg22]

no
10chars.