Leveling Up

[SaintlyFigure]

I realise it must have been mentioned before, but there needs to be a greater emphasis on levelling up. Level is a much better measurement of a players abilities rather than trophies or TH LVL. This system rewards donating also, which is defiantly one of the best ways to LVL up and earn Xp. This could be in the form of a loot bonus or gems bonus. This rewards long time players also, as for many it takes a very long time of playing to reach level 100. So far all you get is a message saying LVL 94 or whatever, but I think this defiantly needs to play a bigger part in the game.

[MrFailology]

Levels can easily be skewed by clan donations. Some guy on this forum posted a picture of a TH7 that was lv294 with 3.1M donations. Does that mean he's one of the best players in Clash? Definitely not. But, he is an outlier, and he has specifically set out to do such.

With that being said, I agree. Levels should carry more weight in determining things about players, whether it be unlocks, or something to better represent the time a player has spent working toward those levels. Though if we do introduce something to speed the level up process, which is likely to appear if more emphasis was added on levels, we will see MANY more lv300 accounts, which are a cool thing to see, since they're fairly rare.

[WarrenJames]

Before we can push using the village/player level system, said system needs fixed, period.

Here is a link of my most detailed assessment of it.
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...=1#post3680114
(this also saves the thread from another attack of a large post )