Multiple bases

[bonesaw13]

Who the hell bothers to read the Terms of Service?

I have 2 accounts. One on my iPhone one on my iPad. Most people I know have more than one account. In theory this is probably actually a good idea for supercell as more accounts by active users probably would result in more gems being spent.

But it would be very exploitable. I use my noob account solely to bring down our clans overall level in Wars so we get easier match ups.

[WarrenJames]

Who the hell bothers to read the Terms of Service?

I have 2 accounts. One on my iPhone one on my iPad. Most people I know have more than one account. In theory this is probably actually a good idea for supercell as more accounts by active users probably would result in more gems being spent.

But it would be very exploitable. I use my noob account solely to bring down our clans overall level in Wars so we get easier match ups.

Who reads the ToS? Same ones that read the EULA, and the ones that actually read the Read Before Posting sticky thread before making thier first post.
So... hardly anyone. But you are still bound by them. (doh! )

Just for practicality sake, Supercell should allow for more than one village, given how common a thing it is already. If they cracked down and enforced the ToS, they'd tick of much off thier playerbase.

I've been thinking about how to deal with the end-game dilemma of 'why keep playing?', as well as the 'what happened to the fun I had early on in game?' Multiple villages, either full villages, or some partial function villages, would help with some of these issues to a point, with adding some much needed replay value. Many games have this, and is quite common. But they (Supercell) need to hammer out how they want to do this, since it is thier game, and adding such a thing would cause a sudden explosion of new villages, and could (but not totally sure) really stress out thier servers.

So... there you have it... total uncertainty.

[Ectar]

Hi,

it it has come to me and I have realised that many high level players have a second or lower leveled account which can be complicated to make so my idea is to add this feature. It could possibly work like the base editor mode how you can have 3 saved base designs but it would be 3 separate villages instead. Comment your opinions below any feedback would be appreciated.

not terrible idea, but to what end? it would basically come down to you donating to yourself, i cant see any thing wrong with it tho, but it would make war better if you had players with three bases that each had two attacks.

supercell could make more money on gem sales if there were more bases

i dont see any downside to it

and if anyone things its exploitable change the record, anything is exploitable if you know how to exploit it, and its only an exploit if supercell didn't originally intend you to use it that way

[SirVargan]

Who reads the ToS? Same ones that read the EULA, and the ones that actually read the Read Before Posting sticky thread before making thier first post.
So... hardly anyone. But you are still bound by them. (doh! )

Just for practicality sake, Supercell should allow for more than one village, given how common a thing it is already. If they cracked down and enforced the ToS, they'd tick of much off thier playerbase.

I've been thinking about how to deal with the end-game dilemma of 'why keep playing?', as well as the 'what happened to the fun I had early on in game?' Multiple villages, either full villages, or some partial function villages, would help with some of these issues to a point, with adding some much needed replay value. Many games have this, and is quite common. But they (Supercell) need to hammer out how they want to do this, since it is thier game, and adding such a thing would cause a sudden explosion of new villages, and could (but not totally sure) really stress out thier servers.

So... there you have it... total uncertainty.

^^^completely agree with this