I agree with you
I agree with you
You want, I want, everybody want wants.
Just in case this has never been pondered by you. What it the world was actually not all about what you want? What if the world was better off if you didn't get what you want?
Lets say we have a leader. Lets call him Weak Wimpy. So WW couldn't lead ants to sugar. Everyone knows he is lame at being leader so no one respects him. The only way anyone will give him the time of day is if they can get him to use his leader powers to give them something. And once they have it they lose interest unless there is something more to give.
So WW's scenario
- Guy joins - "Nice clan. Give me elder I will stay". WW wants him (especially if he says he thinks its a nice clan) so gives elder.
- Next day the guy says "I have lasted 24 whole hours without self destructing. I should not be putting in all that effort if you don't trust me. If you don't make me co I can't feel trusted. I can't stay somewhere where I don't feel trusted" WW wants him so gives co.
- Next day - Guy has an itch to be given something. Getting given something is how he reassures himself that he is important so he can't last a day without someone giving him something. But WW doesn't have anything left to give. That doesn't work. So he leaves for a new clan so he can be given elder.
- WW is all bummed out. This happens all day every day. he needs to be able to give guys something. So he dreams up more promotions he could give and goes to the forum and requests it. Even throws a tantrum or two when someone points out how silly this is.
If WW gets his way (and he has not thought this through) he has accomplished nothing more than one more day before he has nothing left to give and the guy leaves for a clan that will give him something.
Meanwhile WW's clan is in a shambles because of all the many ways WW sucks as a leader. Because he was simply using promotions to buy membership there is no actual leadership structure. he figures that just has to be someone else's fault. Never figures out that if he can't create a management structure with three roles he is not going to be able to do it with 4 roles either.
Last edited by rwelshjr; March 27th, 2015 at 11:25 PM.
If everything angers you then you will spend your entire life being angry.
If everything pains you then you will spend your entire life in pain.
no this......we have enough roles already. But maybe could use a tweak so that is is under co-leader to advance the abilities of the clan. and this is just a knockoff of boom beach
A co leader is a co owner of the clan no one should be able to kick them out of what is theirs, seriously supersell should just reduce the number of ranks to leader and member it would really discourage children from playing this game.
Don't promote him to co-leader then.
love it! Vote YES!
I agree with adding an additional role only one that doesn't have any responsibilities so leaders can tell the difference between new members, members in war or not, or just to be able to give rank without disruptive individuals trying to do leadership jobs when a leader doesnt want them to. Call it "Warrior" rank.
Honestly just seems really useless. I think the ranks are fine the way it is, or add something between co leader and elder, not another high rank like co
Stats: Level 104|Mid Town Hall 9| 42k FiN | 290m GG | 280 EE | 200 War Stars | Wall-Hater
Clan: ClashPub | Mature Adult who gets worked up over wars way too much |