A NEW CLAN ROLE? - CLAN OFFICER - Hope it will! [VOTE PLEASE]

[GameSketcher]

There's a LEADER, there are CO-LEADERS and one of them promoted somebody to CO! And now you CAN'T DEMOTE him without the LEADER!!! :/
This have to CHANGE!

So here's one of SOLUTIONS:
A NEW clan role, with rights as the Leader, but can't do anything to him. He is just like Co-Leaders but can demote Co-Leaders! And there CAN BE ONLY ONE CLAN OFFICER!

Please reply, vote and rate this thread!

Message for SUPERCELL: Please add the Clan Officer or another role like this to solve that problems with Co-Leaders... Thanks!

*
So when I read this conversation I discovered something...
A. There can be only max. four Co-Leaders in a clan

B. There can be max. two Co-Leaders and there should come a new role: Senior Elder (/superior/co...) which can send Clan Mails, start a CW and demote/promote elders. (but he can't promote on higher position as elder - Senior Elder/Co-Leader)

C. Your idea?


So what about this? Please reply guys... A./B./C.

[AnthonyVince]

Then you promote someone to Clan Officer, and oh no! Onkly the leader can demote him. Then we should make another rank to demote that person. And another. And another. you see where I'm going?

[BlahBlah161616]

There's a LEADER, there are CO-LEADERS and one of them promoted somebody to CO! And now you CAN'T DEMOTE him without the LEADER!!! :/
This have to CHANGE!

So here's one of SOLUTIONS:
A NEW clan role, with rights as the Leader, but can't do anything to him. He is just like Co-Leaders but can demote Co-Leaders! And there CAN BE ONLY ONE CLAN OFFICER!

Please reply, vote and rate this thread!

Message for SUPERCELL: Please add the Clan Officer or another role like this to solve that problems with Co-Leaders... Thanks!

I think that if you just made this: Senior Coleader as a sort of leader for the Coleaders instead of officer then it would make more sense: but it should require a clanmate to be coleader for at least 5 days and for the leader to promote the person. That way the rank is actually earned, and there can only be one Senior Coleader.

[BlahBlah161616]

Then you promote someone to Clan Officer, and oh no! Onkly the leader can demote him. Then we should make another rank to demote that person. And another. And another. you see where I'm going?

Not at all...

[spartanMook117]

LOVE THIS IDEA!!!!! The name could be : Executive Leader, Senior Co-leader, superior co-leader. Something like those.

[AnthonyVince]

Not at all...

How not? And we reaaallllyyyy don't need anymore positions. If you promote someone to co willy nilly, it's the clan's problem, not Supercell's.

[BlahBlah161616]

I think that if you just made this: Senior Coleader as a sort of leader for the Coleaders instead of officer then it would make more sense: but it should require a clanmate to be coleader for at least 5 days and for the leader to promote the person. That way the rank is actually earned, and there can only be one Senior Coleader.

How not? And we reaaallllyyyy don't need anymore positions. If you promote someone to co willy nilly, it's the clan's problem, not Supercell's.

This is the solution, the quote above yours.

[spartanMook117]

How not? And we reaaallllyyyy don't need anymore positions. If you promote someone to co willy nilly, it's the clan's problem, not Supercell's.

Hey buddy!!! This is Ideas and Future Requests that we want!!!!!!

[EmeraldRange]

The biggest power gap is between coleaders and elders. The smallest power gap is between leaders and coleaders. You are missing the point. We need a rank in between coleader and elder.

The only difference between leader and coleader is that the leader can demote coleader and.... Thats pretty much it. If you hae enough problems managing coleaders that you ask for this clan officer, I think that reflects a problem in your clan rather than a problems with clash.

And yes, this is "Ideas and Feature Requests", but it isn't "Ideas and Feature Requests that might make things worse for everyone, but seems to benefit me and my clan if I don't consider the consequences."

But let's say the coleaders in your clan were chosen because they could handle the responsibilities and the job requirements that go along with this job (please note, I did not say reward or candy), but you still need someone to controll them all. That's why you have the leader- to control the coleaders.

Besides, who is going to control all the clan officers leaders will promote to for something ridiculous, for example getting 1000 donations. Thats why we all so need a Senior Clan Officer and then a Supreme Clan Officer and a Supreme Clan Officer Officer and .....

Sorry for the harsh reply, but I am also somewhat replying to the other people on this thread. We do not need a rank between two ranks that are virtually the same.

[dbolg22]

As I just said, we don't need more ranks. Just choose wisely in your clan.

We don't need any more positions! Sorry but anything else would just be unnecessary! Anthony raises a good point about creating a new position to demote the next position! It's a cycle!