How to eliminate ♥♥♥♥/Sandboxing

[Shaun1980]

♥♥♥♥ is a problem, it's unethical and gives people an unfair advantage but...I can understand why people use it. Practice.

How often after getting that 99% (or a total fail) do you think "man, I wish I knew how to do better?"

With that in mind, why not make it possible to sandbox attack previously attacked bases? No loot, no cost for troops or spells, just for fun? I think we'd all benefit from that, don't you?

[webbie]

I don't think it would get rid of sandboxing.

I would love the ability to attack bases after the war ends as it would be a great learning opportunity both to demostrate attacks for other players and for them to practice them.

Don't think it will happen though.

[SirVargan]

Someone is always going to exploit something, no matter how bad you want it, it can be exploited in some way. That's why I hate those kinds of people. They ruin everything

[sylveonzmushi]

Question, what is sandboxing?

[rwelshjr]

I like the idea of being able to retry war attacks AFTER the fact on a war hat has ended. Since you are not going to see them again anyhow it doesn't hurt. its only good for training.

No loot or any rewards. Not troops, just use what you used the original attack. Basically just reset your war attack.

[Xitra]

I like the idea of being able to retry war attacks AFTER the fact on a war hat has ended. Since you are not going to see them again anyhow it doesn't hurt. its only good for training.

No loot or any rewards. Not troops, just use what you used the original attack. Basically just reset your war attack.

Honestly, I'd spend gems to be able to retry attacks. As you say, after the war is decided, so it doesn't matter, and using the same troops/spells. Basically, just try to perfect my deployment, based on learning from my mistakes. I'm not even talking about being able to do it better because you know where the traps are, etc. That's lame, doesn't teach you anything. I mean trying to path my troops better, based on learning how the pathing went wrong.

[ColonelAwesome]

While this idea may be good, it would not in any way stop people from using 3rd party software.

[rwelshjr]

While this idea may be good, it would not in any way stop people from using 3rd party software.

I agree with that. But also the guys doing that would not be interested in this idea either. They want to pre-practice their attacks BEFORE the fact to gain an advantage directly for the war at hand.

What we are talking about here is to be able to practice after the face, and only for the purpose of getting batter at attacking war bases in future wars. Sometimes its hard to find farm bases to practice on because they are set up with a different strategy and purpose from war bases.

Also, a change from what I said before. Instead of same troops maybe it should be practicing with an army made up of what you have. That way you can practice not just your deployments and pathing but also whether you are making the right choices for what you are looking at. That would allow you to develop your skills for picking the right strategies for different layouts.