Inactive clan leaders

[Trackstar2013]

We should be able to see how long it has been since clan members have logged in, so we know who is inactive so we can remove them, but also if a leader is inactive for more than 30 days, a co-leader or top 5 ranked in trophies should be able to replace him as leader, because a clan is worth nothing without leadership

[dahimi]

Another fresh spawn and another ruled out idea.

Like chocolate and peanut butter.

[TimothyH97]

Another fresh spawn and another ruled out idea.

Like chocolate and peanut butter.

well said.

btw... you have the perfect avatar............

[ironagedave]

We should be able to see how long it has been since clan members have logged in, so we know who is inactive so we can remove them, but also if a leader is inactive for more than 30 days, a co-leader or top 5 ranked in trophies should be able to replace him as leader, because a clan is worth nothing without leadership

Just start a new clan with all the other members if your leader is inactive.

[chrispeterson]

Just start a new clan with all the other members if your leader is inactive.

Would suck if they were level 2 or three though

[ironagedave]

Would suck if they were level 2 or three though

true I guess they can stick it out - they can always opt them out of wars if there is a co-leader, eventually supercell will delete their account then, TBH co-leaders have just as much power and alternatively a 50 v 50 the clan should have enough attacks between them for that to be not much of an issue.

[dahimi]

true I guess they can stick it out - they can always opt them out of wars if there is a co-leader, eventually supercell will delete their account then, TBH co-leaders have just as much power and alternatively a 50 v 50 the clan should have enough attacks between them for that to be not much of an issue.

It's very unlikely SC will delete accounts. I know they reserve the right to, but the cost of all of them would probably be paid for by one of them coming back and making a gem purchase.

I do think they should come up with a solution to this issue now that clans can level up and leaving to create another one is not nearly as easy. It might be that folks will need to make a support request though.

[ironagedave]

It's very unlikely SC will delete accounts. I know they reserve the right to, but the cost of all of them would probably be paid for by one of them coming back and making a gem purchase.

I do think they should come up with a solution to this issue now that clans can level up and leaving to create another one is not nearly as easy. It might be that folks will need to make a support request though.

Perhaps a democratic approach - I know I hate to throw politics in - like a number of seasons of inactivity leads to a leadership recess where all members can vote for a new leader from the Co-leaders.

[rwelshjr]

Would suck if they were level 2 or three though

The problem is that it is still the leaders clan to do as he wishes with, they can't take it away from him just because someone else wants it. (and lets face it, that's the real reason, someone wants to have for themselves something the leader built and is using the inactivity to justify taking it)

If the clan has accomplished something such as leveling up or a large number of wins then they did that under that persons leadership (who also paid to start it so its something purchased) so it does remain something they own and worked (whether they worked hard or got others to do it for them) to build it up after they purchased it.

If the clan wishes to stop contributing to that leader then they are welcome to go of to start a new clan and make their accomplishments there. They have to choose what they want to start over or to continue to put with (and contribute to)the existing situation. Its really no different than if a clan has a lot of exp points but the leader is a jerk no one likes. They have to decide for themselves whether to put up with that or leave.