
Originally Posted by
theangryewok
Let's say this is implemented. A year down the road, will people start asking for a 5 star, a 6 star or 100 star system? I think this idea is just a "feel good" change, and won't change anything other than perhaps a wasted update when SC could be working on big stuff (quests, troops, th11 etc). If you want the star system to change, start from scratch.
I agree, a 99% one star sucks, but it is part of the system and game. The TH is what matters. If you can't knock it over, you don't win as much as if you could.
Adding more stars or changing the damage to star ratio will not change anything. 3 star 75% will be the new 2 star 66%. A 2 star 99% will be the same as our current 1 star situation. "Yay I got 2 stars (if I understand OP correctly) instead of 1 like I used to"... yet you did the exact same thing... let the th stand. You "failed". You still won't be able to 3 star max th10 bases if we scoot the numbers around.
I don't think this will change the underlying "issue" which is 1) that 3 staring a th10 is very difficult, 2) people are sloppy attackers and it does take finesse to 3 star an equal base to you at higher levels. The only way to solve those is to practice your raids, and come up with new army compositions, not fudge the numbers.