THANK YOU FOR YOUR OPINION! IM GOING TO RESPOND ONE BY ONE TO YOUR POINTS
Why?
IN MY OPINION IT INCREASE THE WAR DYNAMICS!
1. Adding more STAR's decreases the separation between a PERFECT ATTACK (100%) and a "not Perfect attack".
AS I SEE THINGS IT MAKES DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ATTACKS THAT AIM TO GET ONLY 50% +TH WHICH IS REALLY SIMPLE WITH ATTACKS OF MORE THAN 75% +TH WHICH IS REALLY DIFFICULT IF YOU ATTACK AN OPPONENT WITH THE SAME TH LEVEL.
2. Getting a 3 STAR is a challenge, and it should be rewarded appropriately. (ie. much more!)
OK ! I AGREE ( A 100% ATTACK SHOULD BE REWARDED MORE / THE SAME IF YOU GET 4 STARS )
3. In our clan, NOT getting a 3 STAR is considered a "failed" attack.
I`M IN A TOP 100 RANK CLAN. IN MY CLAN ATTACKING YOUR SAME NR OPPONENT AND GETTING ONLY 2 STARS IS NOT CONSIDERED A FAIL. ATTACKING A TH LOWER OR AN OPPONENT RANKED MUCH LOWER IN THE MAP - IS CONSIDERED A FAIL
4. Why should a clan, who can't do 3 STAR attacks, be given a greater opportunity to earn stars with "failed" attacks?
THIS IS NOT WORTH RESPONDING! YOUR PERCEPTION OF OTHER CLANS IS NOT REAL
5. The current system encourages excellence, a revamped system, with more STAR's, would encourage mediocrity.
4 STAR WOULD NOT ONLY ENCOURAGE EXCELLENCE BUT ALSO WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BARELY 50%+TH ATTACKS TO THOSE NEARLY 100%
Bottom line, the current system is good, and doesn't need to be changed.
IT`S YOUR OPINION!
Thanks,
THANK YOU TOO
Btw, if you want to join our clan, look us up ... Top Chiefs (#9UPR2QG9)
MAY BE ONLY FOR A MOMENT BECAUSE I REALLY DOUBT WHAT YOU SAY IS REALISTIC



