SC and all players should watch this @LAVAHOUDS OP

[Jappchillin]

Who cares who he is? What does one person posting up videos of successful attacks prove? I want to see ALL attacks from various people not some one sided bias debate. I don't see anyone 3 starring bases with all lavahounds, so I fail to see how they're op. They, along with balloons and minions make for a good comp but so do other troops. He isn't showing you everything so don't praise this one youtuber as the only primary source for your argument.

You kids would never make it as a lawyer or even on a middle school debate team with logic like that. If you can't look at things from both sides you have no business making an argument.

[GoldGrabber]

Who cares who he is? What does one person posting up videos of successful attacks prove? I want to see ALL attacks from various people not some one sided bias debate. I don't see anyone 3 starring bases with all lavahounds, so I fail to see how they're op. They, along with balloons and minions make for a good comp but so do other troops. He isn't showing you everything so don't praise this one youtuber as the only primary source for your argument.

You kids would never make it as a lawyer or even on a middle school debate team with logic like that. If you can't look at things from both sides you have no business making an argument.

Lol you'r just jealous and mad cause he have more exp and knowledge over you, he is better than you and he said to nerf your troop which you are dependent to be good

[Pete82]

Lol you'r just jealous and mad cause he have more exp and knowledge over you, he is better than you and he said to nerf your troop which you are dependent to be good

Now there is a great argument! Is it even possible to have a discussion anymore?

[Jappchillin]

Lol you'r just jealous and mad cause he have more exp and knowledge over you, he is better than you and he said to nerf your troop which you are dependent to be good

And on this note fellas, this thread is done. Just another lone child crying wolf.

[junyab]

Love it.

Lavahounds when they were introduced - "Hounds suck. What a pointless new troop."

Lavahounds after people learn to use them - "Hounds are OP. They NEED a nerf, they've ruined the game."

[GoldGrabber]

And on this note fellas, this thread is done. Just another lone child crying wolf.

First, who do you think you are to call me a child?

second, you started being rude and acting like a kid saying:

"You kids would never make it as a lawyer or even on a middle school debate team with logic like that. If you can't look at things from both sides you have no business making an argument."

just gave you an answer to your education level

[Gama321]

Who cares who he is? What does one person posting up videos of successful attacks prove? I want to see ALL attacks from various people not some one sided bias debate. I don't see anyone 3 starring bases with all lavahounds, so I fail to see how they're op. They, along with balloons and minions make for a good comp but so do other troops. He isn't showing you everything so don't praise this one youtuber as the only primary source for your argument.

You kids would never make it as a lawyer or even on a middle school debate team with logic like that. If you can't look at things from both sides you have no business making an argument.

He is someone who quite possibly knows what's in the next update and is just echoing what many others have already said. Also whats the other side of the argument exactly? Don't think its actually been presented, just noobs saying "you cant spam 8 hounds and get three star so its not OP", or "it has less dps than most troops".

[Pete82]

He is someone who quite possibly knows what's in the next update and is just echoing what many others have already said. Also whats the other side of the argument exactly? Don't think its actually been presented, just noobs saying "you cant spam 8 hounds and get three star so its not OP", or "it has less dps than most troops".

The other side of the argument might be a thoughtful discussion on when a nerf is necessary, what type of data/observation leads to that point, the amount of time before action by SC, a mention of how often TH10s should theoretically be able to be 3-starred, a discussion on evolving base designs, a discussion on balancing ground vs air, etc. To me a nerf is a last resort, a sort of "bail-out" when it is clear things are lopsided. Do you have clarity on this being the case? Does SC? I agree that one person failing or succeeding does not prove anything.

Edit: What we have right now is an opportunity. Hounds are all the rage (pun?), and some lucky base designer can get famous with a cool-named layout which defends them quite well. The game evolves. Players react to it. This is what keeps things interesting. Nerfing everything cool back to the status quo keeps things boring.

Certain armies get popular at certain times. In my opinion people are way too quick to call for nerfs before enough data is collected to understand what is going on. Not that SC listens to us, but I would hate to see rapid changes happen too often. Slight tweaks here and there is much better.

[mhib]

He is someone who quite possibly knows what's in the next update and is just echoing what many others have already said. Also whats the other side of the argument exactly? Don't think its actually been presented, just noobs saying "you cant spam 8 hounds and get three star so its not OP", or "it has less dps than most troops".

He's one of the big youtubers, and I think one of them that went to SC. I know he's does some of the sneak peak videos. I'm sure he knows a little bit of what the update is going to be or the direction they're heading. Several of the big youtubers have stated they know a little but not everything.

[Bwit51]

If anything I think they need a buff my lvl 2 hound dosnt do anything compared to my lvl 4 golem! Gowiwi and wipe might as well be nerfed if you gonna do it to the hounds