Be careful who you revenge

[Zenya]

Revenge is useless even if I could do it while they were online.

Not really? Free loot, no cost to raid, free cups whats useless about it?

[AxionXD]

This feature would turn into "I don't want to attack anyone because then I'll be revenged by them eventually, whether I have a shield or online"

[blackcaesar]

This seems a good idea, there are a few in my queue I'd like to catch, but IMO more revenges wouldn't be a good thing for the game as a whole.

It would give players an incentive to attack weaker bases for fear of the revenge from the strong guys.

Those weaker guys are then more likely to do revenge zappings (although initial zap raids are likely to reduce).

Also, whenever I see revenge attacks the net loot position for both parties hardly seems worth eithers effort - huge amounts of lix is likely to leave the game.

I say shorter shield times of 2-4-8hrs

[jakewebs]

No loot bonus hurts too.

Revenge is impossible nearly everywhere nearly all the time. I tried revenging everyone on my log at 1600 and all but one were online or had active shield.

[pappymcgee]

Not really? Free loot, no cost to raid, free cups whats useless about it?

Because it's more worth while to move on attacking in the ranks; rather than wasting time trying to revenge someone. Learn to get paid kid. :P

[Wintaburr]

*presses revenge button*
*Player is online*

(waits a few minutes)

*presses revenge button*
*Player has an active shield*

"NOOOOOOOO!!!"

I know the 'feels'.

[ChiefJoshuaCOC]

i say no and wrong subforum

[sFoster83]

What a nonsense title.

If you revenge someone they can't revenge you back!!!!
Under absolutely no circumstances do you need to be careful who you do a revenge attack on.