Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Chose who does clan war!

  1. #1
    Fresh Spawn
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    3

    Chose who does clan war!

    Chose in your clan who is going to do war. Some people might be on holiday for example so they won't be able to do war, so if you could chose who could do war then they wouldn't be in the war! Thanks

  2. #2
    Centennial Club Fdy47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Quito, Ecuador
    Posts
    138

    Well...

    As a co-leader of a clan, this feature will be excelent and could be only available for leaders, or maybe for coleaders too, and also a button for all members where they can choose to participate or not in a clan war, we only have to wait to SC, this idea isnīt ruled out, and I had seen too many threads about this so I think one day will be possible.

  3. #3
    Forum Hero rwelshjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    6,662
    I support this idea , and its been posted a lot of times. Below is a list of threads that might help you to read plus a suggested approach to how to implement.

    Quote Originally Posted by LukeNQ View Post
    Similar Threads


    Replies: 18Last Post: 4 Weeks Ago, 11:11 AM


    Replies: 5Last Post: December 11th, 2014, 06:39 PM


    Replies: 0Last Post: October 16th, 2014, 11:49 PM


    Replies: 7Last Post: June 27th, 2014, 03:54 AM


    Replies: 1Last Post: June 1st, 2014, 12:37 PM
    How it should work...

    There should be a button (it can be a new one or the war shield can be modified) that toggles a player as in or out.

    Access to hit the button to toggle should go to the leader and the player in question.
    ---- individual players cannot opt each other in or out
    ---- its an argument either way to give it to co as well - Good for clans where co is a management job, bad for clans that give it out like candy. (I consider the latter to be a sign of a bad leader)
    ---- A leader who abuses authority to opt guys in against their wishes are really just hurting their own selves for how they are adding a risk to their war participation. (the guy might then just not attack anyhow, if not seeing eye to eye with leader he wont care)
    ---- A leader opting a guy out against his wishes has that prerogative to decide who he wants in his war. And its still nicer than just kicking the guy like happens now.

    The status of a player is only a factor right at the time a war starts. Instead of just selecting all eligible players from the total population it will just be all eligible players from the opted in group.
    ---- Can even implement by leveraging the existing eligibility functionality that currently is only driven by a timer.

    After that everything works the same. The list of warriors from the clan is rounded to an even 5 via the existing logic and then the matchmaking calculation takes place also using the existing logic.

    A player joins a clan with his eligibility set the same way it is today. (He is in unless there is a timer)


    Things that would not happen -
    ...A player cannot add themselves to a war after the fact. If they change their status during a war it makes no difference until the next war when that status is read at startup.
    ...This would not serve as a way to replace members that take off during war. if they do that then there is the same affect on the war as there is today. Unused attacks stay unused. (it will never change that this just stinks when guys pull that stunt)
    Last edited by rwelshjr; January 25th, 2015 at 09:18 PM.
    If everything angers you then you will spend your entire life being angry.
    If everything pains you then you will spend your entire life in pain.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •