Clan War Standards

[Trirage]

So currently I am in a clan named "Phantom Crusade" which has won all the clan wars we have searched for and would like you guys to notice one thing that gets in the way, and i'm sure some of you have experienced this.

Clan members that got kick or left the guild while clan is in preparation day. I noticed this when we had 11 members (we're still small so...don't mind this.) one left which still makes us eligible for a 10v10 war BUT! The game won't switch the player who got kick/left with a player who didn't get in the war. For example :

~~~
user1: example
user2: example

A guild has 11 members. User1 left the guild but got included in the war. User2 however didn't and is left to wait for the next war which is 2 days. User2 leaves guild because he couldn't join the war. (impatience)

~~~

So why not...Make the game switch any player who left the guild with the current player who is in the guild! Similar to basketball, whenever there is someone who's tired/injured gets replaced with a new one! Or you could let the leader switch them himself/herself!

That way, your clan won't go 9v10,14v15 and so on in wars!~

[Kirrily]

You do realise how matchmaking works in clan wars? I can see plenty of players abusing this.

[Trirage]

You do realise how matchmaking works in clan wars? I can see plenty of players abusing this.

What I am asking here is for the other member being able to join a war which he could have join! Right now we have a member who left and is putting us currently on a 14v15! I don't really care what the game/leader it/he/she enlists, as long as we get our fun of doing war.. We don't care about losing as our clan motto suggests : "Losing only makes you stronger, the faster you realize that, the better you become..."

(If you are referring to the leader choosing the members, that could be left alone. But, not having a player replace the the left/kicked one would be an advantage to the other side...)

Eitherway, Thanks for your reply! :3

[Thwnd]

Let's pretend that your 11th player in trophies is really a fully maxed TH10 that is just slumming it down at 200 trophies. You start your war as 10v10 so he's left out of the matchmaking process. As soon as war starts, you have your 10th player leave the guild so that #11 can slide into the war. Now your bottom player in the war is a fully maxed TH10 that wasn't factored in when the matchmaking happened. is that fair to the other clan? do you think clans could possibly abuse it in the manner i just laid out? maybe instead of just one max TH10 coming into the war you have 5. this is way too easy to be abused.

[W4RD3N]

Absolutely not. If you have to kick during a war, odds are you're a ♥♥♥♥ clan. If someone leaves during war you should have spent more time feeling them out before starting a war with them. Either way, good leadership can prevent this. If you aren't ranked and eligible for war, you shouldn't get to be an alternate. Tough. Get ranked if you want in war. I hear what you're saying, but this is a problem created by your clan, not SC.

[Trirage]

Absolutely not. If you have to kick during a war, odds are you're a ♥♥♥♥ clan. If someone leaves during war you should have spent more time feeling them out before starting a war with them. Either way, good leadership can prevent this. If you aren't ranked and eligible for war, you shouldn't get to be an alternate. Tough. Get ranked if you want in war. I hear what you're saying, but this is a problem created by your clan, not SC.

Our clan is not crappy like the rest. That is why we ALWAYS win our clan wars even if we lack 1 cause of leaving/kicking. Our clan is actively doing war everyday since we have placed the war frequency to always which means players that don't get that can leave immediately. We also donate lots of troops which are wallbreakers,dragons,healers and more. It just annoys me that even with our fine established clan, trolls just pop up and leave whenever war is up. If you search for my clan you'll see our stats and everything giving you an idea on how we have been doing.

Eitherway, thanks for your reply!

(TH10 replacing TH's below 10 would be out of the question, if possible just a system that will look towards players that are FIT to replace the missing spot. Similar to TH5 replacing TH5. Ain't that a better solution?)