Limitation

[smrkec]

I have a suggestion! there should be a rule on attacking lower lvl players. Example, there are a lot of higher lvl player intentionally on lower lvls because they can easily collect resources from players who are just growing. Again example, I can't defend my village which is on lvl 35 against a player who is on lvl 100 and has fully developed army. There should be a rule 10 lvls up or down. Than there would bi more of equal fights and that would be fair to us who are trying to play this game. This rule would not apply during clan wars.

[Mann23]

Lol, there is already loot penalty in effect, for trophies there cant be such a rule. Nor can it be for clan wars.

[Sokitani]

I have a suggestion! there should be a rule on attacking lower lvl players. Example, there are a lot of higher lvl player intentionally on lower lvls because they can easily collect resources from players who are just growing. Again example, I can't defend my village which is on lvl 35 against a player who is on lvl 100 and has fully developed army. There should be a rule 10 lvls up or down. Than there would bi more of equal fights and that would be fair to us who are trying to play this game. This rule would not apply during clan wars.

That level100 most likely a th9 or 10 so the loot penalty should only let them steal tiny amounts.

[smrkec]

Lol, there is already loot penalty in effect, for trophies there cant be such a rule. Nor can it be for clan wars.

Yes, there is a rule for trophies. But if You need loot than you don,t care for trophies. And If I want to build th than you can get a lot of loot.

[FEARLESSxRONIN]

I agree that being attack by someone who is way better than you can get annoying but thats why when your a TH5 and get knocked over by that TH10 BA with the maxed level xbows and inferno towers However that TH10 is basically only getting trophies from you and little to no resources from you

[rwelshjr]

I have a suggestion! there should be a rule on attacking lower lvl players. Example, there are a lot of higher lvl player intentionally on lower lvls because they can easily collect resources from players who are just growing. Again example, I can't defend my village which is on lvl 35 against a player who is on lvl 100 and has fully developed army. There should be a rule 10 lvls up or down. Than there would bi more of equal fights and that would be fair to us who are trying to play this game. This rule would not apply during clan wars.

There are two things in place today to restrict this....

1. The loot penalty
2. Troop costs. The higher players have very expensive troops and they need to temper how many they use on a lower base if they want to make a net profit on the raid. Guys just crushing you with OP army are losing money on the deal. They will stop.

[Deadlyxda]

I have a suggestion! there should be a rule on attacking lower lvl players. Example, there are a lot of higher lvl player intentionally on lower lvls because they can easily collect resources from players who are just growing. Again example, I can't defend my village which is on lvl 35 against a player who is on lvl 100 and has fully developed army. There should be a rule 10 lvls up or down. Than there would bi more of equal fights and that would be fair to us who are trying to play this game. This rule would not apply during clan wars.

The only thing that could actually be true for this would be. Are you a lvl35 th10 guy? If yes. Then there is no solution to it as you rushed th without upgrading defense.

If you are th5 or th4-6 which is what that lvl35 suggests, then you don't lose almost any loot at all and you should be happy you got shield from a th9/10 guy instead of some next th Lvl from your lvl who could have stolen 90% loot.

[TheDarkLord098]

The trophy penalty of Supercell should be slightly improved since people this days can't find any base with lots of loots. But yeah, the loot penalty right now is dope