Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: 67% for star

  1. #1
    Pro Member Kirch3b21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    628

    67% for star

    I think you should have to take out 67% of a base for a star (along with town hall and perfect for other 2 stars). Taking out 50% is incredibly easy, even against bases far more upgraded. To get 50% against a town hall a level below is like nothing

  2. #2
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Chillin in Victory Road
    Posts
    837
    I totally disagree with this idea. This would be the final nail in the coffin for barch.
    12: 65/65/40;64/63/39;58/63/34;60/60/30
    11:50/50/20;47/50/20; 50/50/20;50/50/20
    Proud member of the CWSF discord chat.

  3. #3
    Pro Member xmaxer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    In a village filled with dragons.
    Posts
    514
    Highlight your reasoning behind this magic number of 67.

    And your reasoning behind your idea is terrible. Of course it's easy to 50% someone below you townhall wise. That's how every game works. It wouldn't be logical if I couldn't take on some rookie in an MMORPG as a guy with god-like armour and weapons. (This is just a mere example)
    Last edited by xmaxer; December 20th, 2014 at 11:34 PM. Reason: typo


  4. #4
    Senior Member TheTreeMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    The secret grove of the tree men
    Posts
    262
    Is it too easy for you to destroy bases with ths lower than your's, or is it too easy for higher level ths to destroy your base. I think that its the second one. Think about it, you'll get your chance. Eventually there won't be higher ths to crush you. The th level difference will lower how much loot they get, meaning it doesn't mean that much.
    Clash Royale and Boom Beach IGN: Mr. Funderful
    Clash Royale|Arena 5|Level 6|Clan FishyCrackers
    Favorite Card Barbarians|Cards Found 30

  5. #5
    Super Member jobro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Co-Leading the Talented Division of the Illuminati.
    Posts
    918
    Quote Originally Posted by TheTreeMan View Post
    Is it too easy for you to destroy bases with ths lower than your's, or is it too easy for higher level ths to destroy your base. I think that its the second one. Think about it, you'll get your chance. Eventually there won't be higher ths to crush you. The th level difference will lower how much loot they get, meaning it doesn't mean that much.
    Hmm, i think the second one.
    Plus, if 67% was the required percentage for 1 star, then people would be complaining" oh, it should be lower, its too HARD to get 1 star on a base"

    Thanks to venomben for the awesome sig!

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    My house
    Posts
    538
    Quote Originally Posted by xmaxer View Post
    Highlight your reasoning behind this magic number of 67.

    And your reasoning behind your idea is terrible. Of course it's easy to 50% someone below you townhall wise. That's how every game works. It wouldn't be logical if I couldn't take on some rookie in an MMORPG as a guy with god-like armour and weapons. (This is just a mere example)
    I agree with you bro, just answering ur 67 question.
    First, it's 2 off from the magic number of 69.
    Second, 2/3 is about 67

  7. #7
    Forum Hero rwelshjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    6,662
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirch3b21 View Post
    I think you should have to take out 67% of a base for a star (along with town hall and perfect for other 2 stars). Taking out 50% is incredibly easy, even against bases far more upgraded. To get 50% against a town hall a level below is like nothing

    I think this makes sense to me.There have been threads wanting to go to a 4 start system 50/75/100 plus th each being the milestones. I have always argued against those threads pretty hard. But going to a 23 and full plus th as the milestones I think I like.

    Lol, how about if you get less than 33% you lose a star? (Just kidding)

  8. #8
    Pro Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    CANADA
    Posts
    645
    Lol, i would like to know how u came up with the no. 67. That would be interesting

  9. #9
    Centennial Club
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    174
    Quote Originally Posted by Mann23 View Post
    Lol, i would like to know how u came up with the no. 67. That would be interesting
    i think his reason is that 50% of the base is too easy, he thinks 2/3 is more on par.

    i personally think 50% works just fine.
    this wheel aint broke, no fixin needed.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Posts
    449
    This woukd be a huge game changer. You may not realize how poorly this would affect the game. MANY people use ballooion as a pushing strategy to get 50% and this is no easy task, increasing it to 67% would be 10+ buildings(at higher th) and would wreck the balloooion strategy.not even gonna mention Barack, all archers, bam etc

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •