This need to be said.

[victort]

Attachment 80708

Ur logikz haz made my head asplode. U win!

On a slightly mode serious note, does anyone actually know what the OP wants? I am still too stupid to get the point of this thread and am now too invested to casually walk away...

Think he wants everyone(including SC) to accept that BARCH is the only sensible army comp, due to cost/speed, and in subsequent posts, seems to not understand that many people are happy to use bigger costlier armies, often because they enjoy the game more that way, and not all of us are rushing to finish every upgrade asap ......

[kcresj]

Attachment 80709

Ur logikz haz made my head asplode. U win!

On a slightly mode serious note, does anyone actually know what the OP wants? I am too stupid to get the point of this thread and am now too invested to casually walk away...

What i want it was to voice "my" opinion that we should be able to play the way we see fit.. plus a little rant that just came out.. your not stupid i just think i rant to much.. my apologies

[kcresj]

Think he wants everyone to accept that BARCH is the only sensible army comp, due to cost/speed, and in subsequent posts, seems to not understand that many people are happy to use bigger costlier armies, often because they enjoy the game more that way, and not all of us are rushing to finish every upgrade asap ......

Im wasnt trying to make anyone do anything, it was just my opinion, the same as you saying that you enjoy taking your time, that is "your" opinion.

[themariofan]

What i want it was to voice "my" opinion that we should be able to play the way we see fit.. plus a little rant that just came out.. your not stupid i just think i rant to much.. my apologies

You seem to have misunderstood how your post came across to those of us that read it (probably not many--it was a long one). The post came across as saying that "everyone should play as I see fit, and anyone who doesn't is 100% wrong."

[sparticusdanbob]

Thats your opinion and i respect that, but i couldnt care less for you way of "raid" cuz in"my" opinion its sucks and is stupid. why? im glad you ask

lets say you have only 3 hours to play at day.. this means you can do (your words) 6 times as you take half and hour to get ready, lets say you get a base you can "flat" with 250k/250k/1k right? that taking out your cost (you know the cost that takes building ur troops?) youll gate something around 1.5m in gold and 700k on elixir? maybe.. im not doing the actual maths here it just an aprox.

in that same 3 hours, we barchers, can get up to 3m on each.. and thats only taking in count the win bonus not whatever we can get our hands in the base.

now!!!! my way seams more eficient than yours? yes ... you dont agree? well lets agree to disagree

Nah I don't agree.

[d11]

if you really are concerned about profits for you (For SC staff and owners) you could do the same as every other F2P game out there, you can let players customize their village for a price, you want a diferent back ground? heres a pack of backgrounds just for the low price of 10$, you want your queen archer to look better buy her stuff (only looks ok?) batterys are not included btw, i speak from exp, thats always a big seller and btw it always gonna be players that buy gems just to not wait, that will never ever gonna change.

Supercell should hire you right away.

[victort]

Im wasnt trying to make anyone do anything, it was just my opinion, the same as you saying that you enjoy taking your time, that is "your" opinion.

Not my opinion --- it is fact that i enjoy playing more that way........



I understand what you were trying to say ---- It is very true that barch is cost/time efficient.... that too is fact(ish) as BAM could be argued to be slightly better in that respect, but that would be me being pedantic.....)


Personaly I find the idea of the th outside by everyone, for for everyones benefit, idea non sensical --- but that is, as you say, just opinion........

[theangryewok]

we should be able to play the way we see fit

Haha, we do and we will... SC can't change that nor do they want to. No need to post a thread about it.

*casually walks away (finally)*

[kcresj]

You seem to have misunderstood how your post came across to those of us that read it (probably not many--it was a long one). The post came across as saying that "everyone should play as I see fit, and anyone who doesn't is 100% wrong."

:/ i guess your right.. my bad

[kcresj]

Personaly I find the idea of the th outside by everyone, for for everyones benefit, idea non sensical --- but that is, as you say, just opinion........

i know i was the one that said it, but it was just and example i guess i could have use a better one xD