Sorry, I'm late back to the party. I hadn't thought of that... Interesting point. However, it's not really an argument in favor of using elixir for walls. It might as well be an argument for using elixir for mortars and wizard towers. Removing walls from the equation for the moment, what you're saying is that you have a ton of leftover elixir because you refuse to do all the elixir upgrades?
There are a lot of different styles. Some people like to use fancy, expensive armies, which drain their excess elixir. Others like to barch or BAM and use far less elixir. Some people like to use spells, even when they farm, and others don't. Some people donate thousands of troops per week, some donate nothing. In short, your style of gameplay is one of many, and it doesn't really sway me on the elixir walls...
Some people upgrade their walls. Some don't. When I'm out raiding (Gold I-II), in the span of 5-10 minutes of hitting Next, I might come across half a dozen or more level 8, 9, sometimes level 10 town halls, with gold walls or lower. What is that, level 5 walls? For all I know, those people might be complaining what they should do with all their excess gold, since they apparently refuse to dump it into walls. (Seriously, at TH10, is a 75k upgrade to level 6 walls really that expensive?)
So, not to discount what you're saying, as I totally get it. Every little edge you can get. I actually appreciate the effort some players make to go to the bleeding edge of optimization. But when you're the exception, not the rule, it doesn't really help your case to argue for what the rule should be.



Elixer walls only came out like past september this year.. and if you upgrade your walls past level 9, then you have an advantage to us who have upgraded them before the elixer walls came out who started wayy before you
