Yes
N0
Oh yeah sure name it commitment.
All the players who are playing a year or more keep complaining about inactive bases being hidden, right?
Well guess what, people who are TH8 now, never had those bases. You all had them, probably back when you did lvl 8 & lvl 9 walls. Yeah sure do a 400k collector raid every 20 minutes and it's EASY to do walls with gold. We don't have that luxery.
Can SuperCell charge to change our village's name? How much is the price?
Well plain barching seems to have been made less effective wit AT changes and 4th mortar earlier. Good.
I need to know if I can pay just to change my village's name.
You will have to write in to support if you want your village name changed, but Supercell will change it only if (1) the IGN contains your first name and last name, and (2) the IGN is considered offensive by Supercell.
My friend's village name is Lopenix, which sounds like "no p*n*s" and some people find it offensive, but Supercell told him it is not offensive, so he could not change it lol
I am not sure if this is the correct thread to discuss about changing village names.
In all seriousness SuperCell should have locked elixir walls until lv 10+ only.
That way a majority of TH9 & TH10 would be affected too - meaning they also will contribute elixir to the economy.
At the moment mostly TH8 are affected, and some TH9 & TH10 with weak walls.
That way it would be far more certain to ensure elixir remains high all round and worth raiding.
This issue, Aethebelorne, is an engineering issue. The chart and calculations that I have presented in my "incredibly long" post are what Supercell should have done in the first place. In no way, my intentions were to prove that walls upgradable with elixir had to return for TH 7s and TH 8s. If my post appears to show that I support the return, it is simply that considering all factors* available at that time, it made more sense to return that option for TH 8s (at least). In other words, I tried to be as impartial as possible. Consequently, if the data and calculations would have supported the change, I would have had no problem to admit it.
To reply directly to your post. During my raiding sessions, I have to skip so many times because they offer only 30k and 30k elixir or something as such, and they have underleveled walls. Am I thinking they dumped all their gold or elixir into their walls? Nope, because I can see that their walls are underleveled. They have no loot either because someone else raided them before, they did not upgrade their own collectors and mines, or they simply used their loot to upgrade some other stuffs on their base.
The only thing I see right now is that TH 9s and TH 10s are so happy that TH 7s and TH 8s cannot upgrade their walls with elixir anymore, that they deliberatly ignore the fact that, if TH 7s and TH 8s upgrade their walls with gold only, they will probably have to continue raiding with full elixir storages, thus the raided elixir that exceeds the capacity of their elixir storages will be unusable by no one. And considering that a TH 8 needs 177 millions more gold than elixir, the amount of elixir lost might be quite considerable.
Secondly, if you are TH 10 Aethebelorne, in the event that there would be any improvement whatsoever on the elixir economy, you will probably not see it at all, because the TH 9s will still be dumping their elixir into their walls. Once Supercell will see that there is still no economic improvement for TH 10s, it will probably take away that option from the TH 9s as well. At that time, even more people will be annoyed and now it will also be the TH 9s that will be complaining. It really doesn't take a genius to be able to predict that Supercell, unless it decides to change something drastically on the mines and collectors' output or the league bonuses, will take away the wall upgrades with elixir from TH 9s in the next big update.
If I was a TH 9 today, I'd definitely focus on my walls until completion. lol