Chance to harvest opponents' obstacles if you 100% their base.

[HiFliya]

Ok just make the holiday-themed ones off limits. Are people really this attached to their bushes and tree trunks? Also I don't think it would allow for such monumental "gem farming" if the conditions involved are difficult enough to meet. I just think it would make raiding a bit more interesting if there were a possibility of gems at stake. It's not like there would be more overall gems added to the game's economy, just more flow between players.

Like dahimi said, raiding of premium currency will never be a thing. also, sub 200 is a gem farmers paradise as well as the higher leagues as people would be busy with upgrading things and all their builders would be dedicated to their base.

[AxionXD]

Supercell will never allow you the ability to gain an unlimited amount of gems for free. NEVER.

This is would bring a whole new meaning to sub200 farming!

[Shadowkungfu]

It's my base and my vegetation. I don't want anyone messing with it. I have several holiday decorations and would be quite upset if someone else harvested them. Others like to have a decorative ring of trees.

Also do you really think SC is going to allow gem farming? Think really hard about that one.

What Judge Judy said.

[Looming]

If you read the conditions stated in the original post there would clearly be several stipulations in place to mitigate any potential abuse that many appear to be worried about. Sub 200 farming has nothing to do with this.

I suppose it would seem unfair to people who buy gems regularly to see people acquiring gems through such means.

It would certainly promote spending gems to consistently pump out armies capable of getting 100% on bases at a similar level to your own.

[TheConfuzed1]

Are people really this attached to their bushes and tree trunks?

Yes. For example, I am growing a box of trees around my town hall. After a year of doing this, it's about half way finished. I would be ♥♥♥♥♥♥ if someone harvested those trees.

[myBha]

i dont want this. i am carefully setting up pine trees on the corner of the map and this would ruin it.

[Looming]

it isnt really the point how attached we are. the point is that you will have some high level players with available builders drop trophies to harvest lower level player vegetation to get free gems.

the question is not "are we attached to our vegetation"?

the question is, why do you have any right to them?

Because it would be fun... you're dismissing the idea before even attempting to see it in a positive light. Hardly constructive.

[iceageg]

Because it would be fun... you're dismissing the idea before even attempting to see it in a positive light. Hardly constructive.

Incorrect. He has seen this request hundreds of times and had many months to consider it. He knows it is a bad idea already as many of us do. You disregarding the forum rules and the opinions of the people you asked an opinion of is hardly constructive. Sometimes the answer you don't want is the correct one. The correct answer is the constructive one.

[Scuba061]

I think you'd hate this idea yourself when TH9s consistently wreck your base and steal all your vegetation.

Supercell already gives out way more free gems than we deserve. The constant greed for receiving something for nothing is appalling.

[Looming]

Incorrect. He has seen this request hundreds of times and had many months to consider it. He knows it is a bad idea already as many of us do. You disregarding the forum rules and the opinions of the people you asked an opinion of is hardly constructive. Sometimes the answer you don't want is the correct one. The correct answer is the constructive one.

Sorry if this has been suggested before. I read all the stickies and searched quite extensively for similar posts to no avail. I am referring to his posts as hardly constructive due to the narrow minded attitude that comes through in his responses. I understand now that people care about their trees.