Ranks Plus Customizable Properties

[capuchin13]

Each clanmate could have multiple "ranks" indicating what that individual is allowed to do.

invite, clan mail, start war, kick, clan description.
In addition to regular ranks which could just state who can kick who.
if you are co leader, then you won't be kicked by elders and other coleaders, but you can still get kicked by the leader.
So it would probably look something like this:

elder: invite, clan mail
rank: plus optional properties

i don't want elders to kick people I don't approve of. I don't want them to mess with the clan description or the flag. I don't want them to start clan wars. They didn't even participate in the last one.

Maybe I want it to look like this.

Member: start war
elder: start war, invite
co:start war, kick, invite

Maybe I don't mind having constant clan wars. Elders and co leaders can invite, but only co leaders can kick. Leader has all properties.

This seems well organized and may solve some intruder problems.

[Dan93]

All of this I have seen alot on the forums. Please search your idea before posting. Thank you.

[capuchin13]

It is different. As opposed to the we need more ranks. Or the coming up with new names for them. Or creating conditions for them. While they are similar, the method used to create the end result is different. That is what I am proposing, a different method to come to that conclusion in hopes that others will like my method better than someone else's method.

[Gama321]

Each clanmate could have multiple "ranks" indicating what that individual is allowed to do.

invite, clan mail, start war, kick, clan description.
In addition to regular ranks which could just state who can kick who.
if you are co leader, then you won't be kicked by elders and other coleaders, but you can still get kicked by the leader.
So it would probably look something like this:

elder: invite, clan mail
rank: plus optional properties

i don't want elders to kick people I don't approve of. I don't want them to mess with the clan description or the flag. I don't want them to start clan wars. They didn't even participate in the last one.

Maybe I want it to look like this.

Member: start war
elder: start war, invite
co:start war, kick, invite

Maybe I don't mind having constant clan wars. Elders and co leaders can invite, but only co leaders can kick. Leader has all properties.

This seems well organized and may solve some intruder problems.

If you are worried about elders kicking people they shouldn't then they obviously shouldn't be elder.
Am I the only one who thinks its stupid for elders to be able to invite and then not kick? Kicking and inviting come together imo.
Also elders cant send clan msgs or start clan war. If your cos are starting wars and not participating then you should kick them, you should kick anyone who doesn't use both attacks unless they have a reason and they hardly don't attack.

[Sono]

Member: start war

Woah woah woah.... leave this to the elders+ please! some clans have a specific schedule we like to keep like mine and i can't have people joining in and starting a war all of the sudden! I'd rather have them have the ability to invite so i don't have to promote people to elder to invite.

[Dan93]

It is different. As opposed to the we need more ranks. Or the coming up with new names for them. Or creating conditions for them. While they are similar, the method used to create the end result is different. That is what I am proposing, a different method to come to that conclusion in hopes that others will like my method better than someone else's method.

I've seen this before plenty of times as well. Custom ranks: Being able to choose the abilities of each rank. Heard it all a butt load of times before. (about 3 1/2 gallons)

[Sono]

I've seen this before plenty of times as well. Custom ranks: Being able to choose the abilities of each rank. Heard it all a butt load of times before. (about 3 1/2 gallons)

Sounds refreshing.

[capuchin13]

That's what I'm saying. It would be optional.
I have had to get rid of alot of good men because they weren't ready for the specific responsibility. Or because a co leader kept promoting with good intentions, but they ended up messing up the clan.

So if someone joins your clan and wants to send clan mail, but you don't want to risk them kicking out your clan mates.
member:clan mail
Now they have no excuse to need co leader.
Maybe members can kick new clanmates.
Member:kick
Maybe you dont care who joins your clan, so you let everyone do their part to help out.
Member:invite
Now the leader would be the one assigning properties unless otherwise issued.
co leader: property assigner.

[Gama321]

That's what I'm saying. It would be optional.
I have had to get rid of alot of good men because they weren't ready for the specific responsibility. Or because a co leader kept promoting with good intentions, but they ended up messing up the clan.

So if someone joins your clan and wants to send clan mail, but you don't want to risk them kicking out your clan mates.
member:clan mail
Now they have no excuse to need co leader.
Maybe members can kick new clanmates.
Member:kick
Maybe you dont care who joins your clan, so you let everyone do their part to help out.
Member:invite
Now the leader would be the one assigning properties unless otherwise issued.
co leader: property assigner.

Or maybe they can tell you and you can decide whether or not you want to send a clan msg about it, you know, what a co or leader is supposed to do

[Dan93]

That's what I'm saying. It would be optional.
I have had to get rid of alot of good men because they weren't ready for the specific responsibility. Or because a co leader kept promoting with good intentions, but they ended up messing up the clan.

So if someone joins your clan and wants to send clan mail, but you don't want to risk them kicking out your clan mates.
member:clan mail
Now they have no excuse to need co leader.
Maybe members can kick new clanmates.
Member:kick
Maybe you dont care who joins your clan, so you let everyone do their part to help out.
Member:invite
Now the leader would be the one assigning properties unless otherwise issued.
co leader: property assigner.

I know what your saying but what I'm saying is there have been 3 and 1/2 gallons of these posts before on the EXACT same topic. Please search your idea before posting it.