Revenge is a rip off against people who bolt DE

[MackeyS]

Is it fair that someone can drop lightning bolts, steel 2k DE, and leave, then when I go to revenge him I can only get back at most 100?

The loot percentage should only apply to a first time attacker, not a revenge attacker. The revenge attacker should be able to get back up to what was stolen, or the loot cap, which ever is greater. Otherwise it totally defeats the purpose of revenging someone.

The reason that they bolt de is because they cannot acquire much and this is the easiest way for them to gain it. So dont expect to get so much from them in return.

In the game of thieves, i think it is only fair that rich chiefs should have more to offer than the poor chiefs.

Cheers. 😁

[andrgin]

1.) You should stop taking everything so serious. Getting raided is normal. If you are a high th10 with town hall inside, no Gold/elixir and Infernos you offer nothing to the enemy except dark elixir. The rule in this game is you will loose something over night. It may be trophies with town hall outside, Gold/elixir/dark from a normal raid or dark from zapping. You can only choose which one you will loose.

[AxionXD]

How many times have you raided people, only to turn around and spend it before they had a chance to revenge you?

Zap or no zap, that's the nature of the game!

[GoWiWi]

Please no more DE threads please

[NoV4]

revenge is useless against zappers because zappers never have any loot anyhow. thats why they are zaaping in the first place and quite stupidly at that. There bases will never be upgraded to higher levels because they keep spending all their elixer on zaaps. You dont need to be trying to get de untill your base and troops are at good levels first.

100% agree

[WinterSoldier]

The reason that they bolt de is because they cannot acquire much and this is the easiest way for them to gain it. So dont expect to get so much from them in return.

In the game of thieves, i think it is only fair that rich chiefs should have more to offer than the poor chiefs.

Cheers. 😁

They could aquire much if they used that elixer to level up their troops instead of on spells. Im looking at the guy attacking me and im like dude get you level 5 and 6 archers. get your army camps to max, etc before you start worrying about de.

[3TripleS3]

Is it fair that someone can drop lightning bolts, steel 2k DE, and leave, then when I go to revenge him I can only get back at most 100?

The loot percentage should only apply to a first time attacker, not a revenge attacker. The revenge attacker should be able to get back up to what was stolen, or the loot cap, which ever is greater. Otherwise it totally defeats the purpose of revenging someone.

I think you are absolutly right, this would be the only fair way to treat revenges!
Absolutly in favor of this!!! 👍

[SynysterGates]

revenge is useless against zappers because zappers never have any loot anyhow. thats why they are zaaping in the first place and quite stupidly at that. There bases will never be upgraded to higher levels because they keep spending all their elixer on zaaps. You dont need to be trying to get de untill your base and troops are at good levels first.

your IGN and clan? mine Synyster Gates from Malaysian War.
just want to make comparison. thnx

[victort]

The reason that they bolt de is because they cannot acquire much and this is the easiest way for them to gain it. So dont expect to get so much from them in return.

In the game of thieves, i think it is only fair that rich chiefs should have more to offer than the poor chiefs.

Cheers. 😁

Always worth checking.... usually got de myself, come and have a go, if i zapped you...

I usually zap as a bit of a troll, and get rid of zaps if I have spare after a BAM session...... beter than wasting them on sherbert towers.....

The fact it annoys people so much, is an added bonus....

Zap on