We demand to have our levels back

[hb808]

You accused me three time, that's not explaining... this isn't whatever dahimi says or accuse is true, right? I'm not asking for the explanation of the definition, if you haven't noticed.... it's for the explanation of each of the points I made to you... starting with why I thought you agree with 808... which led to your accusation. I won't ask again, you can ignore it if you can't do it.

Where are you attempting to take this exchange?

[dahimi]

You accused me three time, that's not explaining... this isn't whatever dahimi says or accuse is true, right? I'm not asking for the explanation of the definition, if you haven't noticed.... it's for the explanation of each of the points I made to you... starting with why I thought you agree with 808... which led to your accusation. I won't ask again, you can ignore it if you can't do it.

No really I'm not explaining it again. You will get nothing more from me unless you want to argue the actual topic which is whether or not supercell should add levels back to chat.

[GobFather]

No really I'm not explaining it again. You will get nothing more from me unless you want to argue the actual topic which is whether or not supercell should add levels back to chat.

you never explained. I was on topic....

[GobFather]

Where are you attempting to take this exchange?

Not sure yet. Hi

[hb808]

Not sure yet. Hi

You sure are passionate about this cause that you aren't sure of.

[GobFather]

You sure are passionate about this cause that you aren't sure of.

Was only following your footsteps.

[hb808]

Was only following your footsteps.

So, I'm your leader?

[GobFather]

So, I'm your leader?

Inspiration.

[Daddy]

Guys would anyone like to get back on topic or should I just close this right now?

Heated informed discussion = good
Slanging he-said she-said match = bad

up to you

[GobFather]

I apologize to other readers, lol it did get out of hand. I wanted to recap with Dahimi, before I leave my last comment to him.

This is what you wrote:

I wouldn't lump hb in the stop crying category exactly. He has even posted that he supports the badge+level option which I actually do not support. Most of the negative comments are either directed against personal attacks, calls for him to stop posting, insults to SC and SC staff, pointless ranting, or the endless repeating of bullet points that have already been thoroughly discussed.

He seems to have reasonable responses to most unique, coherently made, and well thought out arguments.

He certainly has a way of getting under people's skin though, which I find hilarious.

I replied:

Maybe you find it hilarious because you both agree on the same thing (not all but majority), not the greatest judgement of a character. That's your opinion of him, good to know.. not surprised. But I love having his type of personality here because it makes the forum more interesting.

But regardless of how you negatively portray everyone who disagree with your point, or defend a company... they can complain. And their complaints are towards the company, does it matter how many posts? Is there a limit on complaints? Maybe you will just shut up and do nothing because you agree with everything and feel it's pointless to argue but, don't LIMIT everyone else to your mentality. Are the complaints bothering you? Ignore it. lol, Are the complaints idiotic? Ignore it. You hate these posts? Ignore it. OMG SO EASY. Read the topic title, it's usually a good indicator of what the thread is going to be about unless you just love doing this, I think you and a few others do. I hope I'm wrong.

Then you replied:

Create strawman arguments and knock them down? Yes you do.

This is ALL you wrote to me in your "EXPLANATION" then you said you have explained it three times. Accusation is cheap and easy. This is not an explanation, this is purely an accusation, it's totally different.

Sorry everyone.