Why Zapping Is An Issue, But Something We Should Live With.

[BrianHotshot]

You guys really are acting like it's only the maxed bases that have DE. BK only costs 10k-20k DE. You don't need to be able to raid 1-2k DE offers to max him. It's like a TH6 nexting for a 200k loot offer and skipping the 100ks, then complains when he/she loses the raid.

I can't tell you how many bases there are that don't centralize their DE storage and is premmie in one area or another. Just look for an easier base, they're not hard to find.

I agree that not only maxed bases have DE. But bases that aren't maxed tend to have less DE. Otherwise, a player would need to move to a higher league to get more DE. But of course, the higher league, the more hard defense get, the more attacks you loose, and the more DE is stolen from you.

I agree that many bases don't have centralized DE storages, but if you want to attack it, remember, others will too. And those bases will become hard to find if everyone attacks it and win.

[GixxerBen]

Zapping in my Opinion doesn't require any Skill.
A player snipes my TH and then lightens my DE storage with 5 Spells & takes 1600DE - is just Lame.

However, as long as the Revenge button will not be removed i don't mind them too much.

- Ben

[BrianHotshot]

Zapping doesn't only have to be on storages, it could be on defensive structures or troops. Those require strategy. You have to choose which certain defensive buildings you need to destroy in order to give your army a bigger advantage. More or less, zapping does require some amount of strategy.

[BrianHotshot]

I sincerely apologize for bumping my own thread. I never thought of returning to this thread-neither have I believed that SuperCell was going to ban storage zapping.

To be honest, when SuperCell removed the ability to zap storages, I was shocked, as well as disappointed, for I, as well as many other players view this as a strategy.

I just wanted to revive this thread so that you forumers can see the arguments that were posted both for, and against zapping storage's, and see that there was more than twice as many players that said that zapping storage's was alright. The opinions on this thread are worth a lot, and shows what the community thinks about towards one of the most popularly discussed topic.

Removing the ability to zap storage's may have solved some problems, but many more have risen due to this.

I personally believe that zapping storages for resources IS OK, and I feel no shame for that.

I, and the supposedly 297 other forumers may have lost this argument, but we still strongly believe that zapping storage's is allowed.

Please read these opinions, and suggest your own, so that SuperCell can hear our feedback, and sincere thoughts.

[sj74]

I sincerely apologize for bumping my own thread. I never thought of returning to this thread-neither have I believed that SuperCell was going to ban storage zapping.

To be honest, when SuperCell removed the ability to zap storages, I was shocked, as well as disappointed, for I, as well as many other players view this as a strategy.

I just wanted to revive this thread so that you forumers can see the arguments that were posted both for, and against zapping storage's, and see that there was more than twice as many players that said that zapping storage's was alright. The opinions on this thread are worth a lot, and shows what the community thinks about towards one of the most popularly discussed topic.

Removing the ability to zap storage's may have solved some problems, but many more have risen due to this.

I personally believe that zapping storages for resources IS OK, and I feel no shame for that.

I, and the supposedly 297 other forumers may have lost this argument, but we still strongly believe that zapping storage's is allowed.

Please read these opinions, and suggest your own, so that SuperCell can hear our feedback, and sincere thoughts.

Snap out of it man and move on with your life.

[xtalx]

I sincerely apologize for bumping my own thread. I never thought of returning to this thread-neither have I believed that SuperCell was going to ban storage zapping.

To be honest, when SuperCell removed the ability to zap storages, I was shocked, as well as disappointed, for I, as well as many other players view this as a strategy.

I just wanted to revive this thread so that you forumers can see the arguments that were posted both for, and against zapping storage's, and see that there was more than twice as many players that said that zapping storage's was alright. The opinions on this thread are worth a lot, and shows what the community thinks about towards one of the most popularly discussed topic.

Removing the ability to zap storage's may have solved some problems, but many more have risen due to this.

I personally believe that zapping storages for resources IS OK, and I feel no shame for that.

I, and the supposedly 297 other forumers may have lost this argument, but we still strongly believe that zapping storage's is allowed.

Please read these opinions, and suggest your own, so that SuperCell can hear our feedback, and sincere thoughts.

The issue is more dead-and-buried than this thread you just resurrected.

[AhsenAshraful]

Update:Zapping no longer works.Why bumping your thread is an issue.Zapping is under the ground with a gravestone on its head.

[Echo006]

Get over yourself. Zapping was stupid, a waste of elixir and it made lower levelled players able to get high amounts of dark elixir from TH9s and TH10s which was a huge issue as they didn't even have the armies to break into the base.

You only deserve to get the DE if you actually break into the base with a decent army, not 3 or 4 lightning spells.

As for the sneak peeks, the increased damage for zapping makes the spells viable again and their use has now changed from zapping storages to destroying defensive towers (not that it wasn't before, but now it is more reliable due to the damage increase.)

[Pyrodox]

There's zero justification bringing back zapping. If you want loot then earn it. Gimmick strategies shouldn't be encouraged in this game.

[Sherbarian]

Pointless dead thread bumped by the person who created it is, well........... pointless. Signing off now....