What do you guys think?

[GonzaG]

My idea for the next updte of Clash of Clans is:

If we have a number of wars won, why don´t we have a total of wars lost?. Or maybe a percentage to put wars won out of wars lost. This could help us to know how good is the enemy clan, or just to know how much wars the clan lost.
Do I explain myself? Nothing else to say, GonzaG.

[TreeBranchTwig]

I like the way we can't look at the bad things of clans and instead are only shown the achievements. But a lot of clans which do want to share how many wars they've lost put a win-loss ratio in their description.

[GonzaG]

I like the way we can't look at the bad things of clans and instead are only shown the achievements. But a lot of clans which do want to share how many wars they've lost put a win-loss ratio in their description.

Well, I know that some clans won't like to share how many wars they lost, but it would be a good idea, where you have "Wars Won", to have under it something saying "Wars Lost" or modifying them putting : "Wars Won out of Wars lost". It's only to know that, not to know with who the clan lost or for how much points they lost. It would be another feature of the clan. Thanks for your opinion TreeBranchTwig.

[TheGambatron]

My idea for the next updte of Clash of Clans is:

If we have a number of wars won, why don´t we have a total of wars lost?. Or maybe a percentage to put wars won out of wars lost. This could help us to know how good is the enemy clan, or just to know how much wars the clan lost.
Do I explain myself? Nothing else to say, GonzaG.

i think instead of wars won it should be "war record" and state losses and draws also

[GonzaG]

i think instead of wars won it should be "war record" and state losses and draws also

Well, something like that to know the "war record" like you say.And about de Wars draw, I think that wouldn't be important. If I go to see a clan i wouldn't pay attention to how many wars they have draw. Thanks for your opinion TheGambatron .

[hawdog]

Supercell has a "no name and shame" policy and deems showing losses or any negative stats to be "too hardcore".

If you think about it, it would impact the game in a big way to show losses.

Top clans would get inundated with requests to join, and clans with many losses would get ignored by prospective players looking to join a new clan, thinking their clan sucks at wars and will forever have a difficult time recruiting.

It messes with the balance of the game, and would make the gameplay crappy for many clans (both good war clans and bad war clans).

There's a reason they don't show losses. It makes sense as-is.

[GonzaG]

Well that's a mistake I didn't think about, I didn't think that in that way howdog, I thought it only to know the numbers of lost wars. Well, thanks for your opinion, I'll keep thinking things for updates.