Proofs that inactive players don't appear in the Matchmaking

[mitzu]

I have one friend that has been inactive for over a month.

I always wandered if inactive players can be attacked (if you can find them in the Matchmaking process), now I got my answer.









I'm sure that he doesn't have an active shield, as you might think, and as you can see, he was not attacked since his last log in (because if he was, as you (should) know, his buildings should be damaged upon his next log in).

So, SUPERCELL, for some reason made the Matchmaking in a way that inactive players (aka farms) won't appear in the Matchmaking process.

What do you think about this ?

I personally think that this isn't a good thing, I spend over 500.000 a day NEXTing.

[NSTSquarepants]

blame the economy on obama...fox news said so

[Bwandowando]

fixed it for you

[ImWatchingYouSleep]

I have one friend that has been inactive for over a month.

I always wandered if inactive players can be attacked (if you can find them in the Matchmaking process), now I got my answer.

http://oi59.tinypic.com/67jw46.jpg

http://oi59.tinypic.com/3483eq8.jpg
http://oi61.tinypic.com/29bdqqf.jpg

http://oi62.tinypic.com/skyulf.jpg
http://oi59.tinypic.com/2aeseg.jpg

I'm sure that he doesn't have an active shield, as you might think, and as you can see, he was not attacked since his last log in (because if he was, as you (should) know, his buildings should be damaged upon his next log in).

So, SUPERCELL, for some reason made the Matchmaking in a way that inactive players (aka farms) won't appear in the Matchmaking process.

What do you think about this ?

I personally think that this isn't a good thing, I spend over 500.000 a day NEXTing.

dont be so picky

[o0oAnnyo0o]

I have one friend that has been inactive for over a month.

I always wandered if inactive players can be attacked (if you can find them in the Matchmaking process), now I got my answer.

http://oi59.tinypic.com/67jw46.jpg

http://oi59.tinypic.com/3483eq8.jpg
http://oi61.tinypic.com/29bdqqf.jpg

http://oi62.tinypic.com/skyulf.jpg
http://oi59.tinypic.com/2aeseg.jpg

I'm sure that he doesn't have an active shield, as you might think, and as you can see, he was not attacked since his last log in (because if he was, as you (should) know, his buildings should be damaged upon his next log in).

So, SUPERCELL, for some reason made the Matchmaking in a way that inactive players (aka farms) won't appear in the Matchmaking process.

What do you think about this ?

I personally think that this isn't a good thing, I spend over 500.000 a day NEXTing.

Your post make me go check an account of mine that hasn't been use in few months. As I just checked a moment ago, the TH & all outer building is destroyed. And I checked the collectors, there are 45k/90k in that collector. It means it was attacked recently.

So, I think inactive bases is push far back in the queue, not removed. Maybe your friends base is "lucky"?

[Kirky]

This topic has been done to death and should be pretty well understood now.

[meonhoc]

Some reading during your break:
http://forum.supercell.net/showthrea...=1#post3028747