Clan chiefs need the right to sift clan members for war !

[gringoboy70]

Why do you war if you aren't a war clan or why are people in a war clan if they don't want to war?

[IamNSC]

a moderator or steve has addressed this before.
It won't be implemented anytime soon. idk where the post is though

[Mangangus]

Hey gring we are just a clan some like to war some dont all I'm suggesting is the ability to opt in or out of war on an individual bases .
IamNSC I'm sure some one else has brought this up but i haven't seen any post and am just pushing a thought forward

[badong69]

Or.... war should be exclusive for elders and co's only. Leaders and cos have the power to promote, so give us the option that only ranked players are eligible for war.

[badong69]

Why do you war if you aren't a war clan or why are people in a war clan if they don't want to war?

Simple answer. Troops donations. Friends who want to play with you but dont like warring.

In reality, not all troops are selected to war, but they belong to the same group. Think of the marines. They are one big army, but not all should go to war.

This should be the concept.

[badong69]

And to add to that, we should have a roster with specific task. Like scouting enemy troop composition, a low level player whose sole purpose is to locate trap placements, teslas, cc troops puller, a person that will sacrifice loots for the benefit of the team. There should be roles in the game and it will be more complex playstyle. Right now, war is boring because of mismatch. There should be more to war than what we are having right now which is identifying your target, then attack, rinse repeat.

[Mangangus]

[QUOTE=badong69;3117865]Simple answer. Troops donations. Friends who want to play with you but dont like warring.QUOTE=badong69;3117865]
exactly we are friends! we enjoy the byplay between us. that is why we are a clan ! Mates, friends, family

[AhmedShaheer]

This should happen

[Lloopy14]

People always make judgements in threads like these about people beig bad / lazy / incompetent Leaders and they also make quite a few judgements about clan members too.

All of which are incorrect.

At the end of the day this is a game. The game has grown far beyond what limited tools are available for sorting out wars (ie clan chat) with the only solution being reliably suggested on the forums as finding an external means if communication. People have asked for a third co / leader chat but that does not seem to be in the pipeline at all.

Manually trying to work out how many should be kicked. Who is or isnt going to be included is too much head work at the end of an exhausting day/ week at work. And clan member dont know where they are. Trying to remember from Monday that someone is going away for hols by the next friday is a nightmare.

If you click on my name and search my previous most recent posts there is a response to a previous poster that quotes supersteve.

SC are working on an idealised notion of a clan where everyone 'pulls' together and 'wars should be something you do as a clan' completely ignoring the fact that they automatically exclude 1-4 people anyways if your clan is not a multiple of 5.

Kicking & reinviting causes its own problems and is not a solution.

[Mangangus]

Thanks Ahmed and loopy.
and Loopy you're right , its only a game and if SC dont move with some thought on this then they loose their bottom line .